Jump to content

lukeap69

Members
  • Posts

    124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lukeap69

  1. <p>Alberto<br>

    Try them both on a camera store (if there is one accessible to you). You may get an idea which one is best for you.<br>

    As for your choices, I'll take either of them. I like the AF system and built in speedlite commander of the 7D and I like the IQ of the 5DII than 7D (that is my own taste). But at the moment I am still enjoying and contented with 5D classic + 40D combo. I bought myself a ST-E2 to stop thinking of the 7D's speedlite commander. :)</p>

  2. <p>I have a friend/colleague who started with Sony A200 and acquired Sony/Minolta lenses for quite sometime and wanted to 'upgrade' to full frame. He thought of A850 but then got himself a Canon 5D classic, 100 macro and 17-40L. What a contrasting story.<br>

    BTW, I have some minolta A lenses (beercan, mini-beercan, 28 2.8 and 50 1.4) which are good lenses and will work on sony dslr, I can recommend those to you except the 28 2.8. My main gears are Canon but I shoot Sony/Minolta and contax once in a while.<br>

    Enjoy your A850. It's a nice camera. Wish I could say the same for the system esp. flash.<br>

    Cheers</p>

  3. <p>Probably it will work with the sony dslr without any adapter - I am using Minolta 50 1.4 AF, 28 2.8 AF and 70-210 4 AF on my Sony A200 camera with no problem.<br>

    I did not find any adapter to use it on my Canon bodies. I have one Minolta MD rokkor with adapter (without optics) but it will not focus to infinity when mounted on my Canons.</p>

  4. 100 2.8 macro can be too long to use for portrait for kids but will be better for insects compared to 60 2.8 macro.

     

    i chose the 100 macro because i have sigma 50 1.4. but for one lens solution, 60 macro might be better for you specially the XTi is a small body (compared to my 40D). balance will be better me thinks.

×
×
  • Create New...