coneected

Concerning the photo, when I got it back from the lab I was stunned. I always thought film to not be as defined as digital. Then I went back to see what film it was that I used and found it to be Agfa Vista 100. This is just run of the mill, off the shelf, general purpose film. If that is the case, could the photos I produce improve with a better quality film? The experiment continues.

I began my photography experience using a Canon digital camera. As time moved forward I began taking a photography class using film as the medium. That's when the bug really hit, once I could see how the development side worked. So I bought a Pentax K-1000. I liked it but didn't, so I bought a Nikon FM2. I loved the look of the photos, but didn't know if it was me or the equipment. As I got older and my sight was not what it used to be, I gravitated toward autofocus cameras. I bought a Nikon N90s and fell in love. Maybe 5 years later I acquired a Nikon F5. Now during all this time from the beginning I owned Canon digital cameras and lenses. The Canon XTi, Canon 5D, Canon 1D MKIII, and the Canon 7D Mkii. I want to be able to use and interchange lenses between digital and film so having one system is the only way to accomplish this. Unfortunately that means all my Nikon gear will be up for sale once I choose the film camera that best suits my needs/wants. By the way I can afford two systems, but that doesn't make sense to me at this point. Just sharpening my skills and learning more with each opportunity spent making photos.

The photo below was taken with a Nikon N90s w/Nikon 85mm f1.8 lens and Agfa Vista 100 film. The experiment continues.

 

At this point in the experiment is a Canon EOS-1V HS PB-E2 worth $700.00? I still shoot a lot film, but use Nikon N90s and Nikon F5. I recently ran into a Canon EOS-1V HS supposedly in mint condition with 00 rolls used for $699. Do you think this is a good deal as I am ready to transition over to Canon film? Let hear your thoughts. I kind of question the condition, but am aware this camera can be checked for rolls used. I do like the results I get from my Nikon equipment, I just cannot afford to work with two different systems. I started with Canon digital and have been searching for a decent Canon film camera. Maybe I could save some money by going with the Canon EOS 3, which is probably 1/3 the cost of the Canon EOS-1V HS . What are your thoughts?

<p>I was able to find a Minolta Grip for the 9xi that holds 4 AA batteries. That means no more expensive 2CR5 batteries for this one. I actually have (2) Minolta Maxxum 9xi's. They both have the extended grip, one using AA Batteries and the other still using the 2CR5. I sold my Maxxum 7 to keep the two 9xi's. I now own the best of all three camera manufacturers. The Nikon F5, the Canon EOS 3 and the two Minolta Maxxum 9xi's. These cover all my needs for 35mm film for my remaining days on this planet. To my knowledge I have never had a problem with any of the Nikon's I have owned, and the only problem I have had with a Minolta was the connector between the camera and the grip stopped working. I was left putting batteries in the camera, yet I still had the grip mounted on the camera. In the photo the camera on the right has the grip that holds the 4 AA batteries the one on the left is just an extended grip which is very useful for this body.</p><div></div>

<p>My main concern for a camera is the choice between Full Frame or APS-C and which will help me to deliver the best image quality. Not really seeking to sink $2000. into a newer camera which will deflate in value in a matter of moments. Would rather buy a camera that has some added features yet not empty my bank account at the same time which is why I am still using my Canon EOS 5D and 7D.</p>

<p>I do a little of all of these Nature, weddings, portraits, kids, street, and travel.</p>

<p>I do have a small collection of Canon lenses, some for APS-c bodies and some for Fx bodies. That is probably my biggest concern also is to shoot with APS-c of a full frame body. I use mostly primes 35, 50, 85, 100, and 150 but I have have some zoom lenses 24-105mm f4, 70-200mm 2.8 IS USM, 28-75mm 2.8, 17-50mm f2.8 and a 28-105mm f2.8. The image quality I get using a FX camera far outweighs, (in my opinion) using the APS-c, yet some of my lenses will not work correctly (dark corners) on a Fx body. The body I am using is the original Canon EOS 5D, which I like but I also have a Canon EOS 7D. Was trying to upgrade and was just wondering to drop one to pick up the other or remain with what I have. The collection of lenses I have have helped to improve my photographic abilities. The question being to spend so much money on another body or work with what I have. Thanks for all the feedback.</p>

<p>Is the Nikon D600 a better camera when it comes to picture quality or depth of color or does the newer Canon 5D mkiii options make it a better choice to purchase?</p>

<p>Which of these two cameras has the better image quality or depth of color? Trying to figure out if I should stick with my Canon system or change over to Nikon. Image quality is my main concern of staying with Canon or moving over to Nikon. Any comments welcomed.</p>

<p>I just uploaded a photo to a program called Shuttercount.com and it said my Canon EOS 1D Mark III Shutter count is 736. I just about jumped out of my chair. If this is correct to this practically a new camera. Looks like I have answered my own question. Now it's time to get out and continue this experiment of taking photos 1 or more clicks at a time.</p><div></div>

<p>Has anyone ever used a Nikon D600? I hear raves about the quality of the photos and its ease of use.</p>

<p>I use a Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS the first edition, a Tokina 100mm f2.8, a Tokina 35mm f2.8, a Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 and a Tamron 17-50mm F2.8. I believe if I chose the 1D Mark III I may not have to worry about another camera for quite a few years.</p>

<p>The Canon 1D Mark III has less than 500 shutter actuations, the Can EOS 7D has approximately 25,000. </p>

<p>I have been offered a choice between two digital cameras. I shoot a lot of family photos and high school football and basketball games. The offer I have been made is as follows: Canon EOS 1D Mark III or a Canon EOS 7D. I like the quality of how the 1D Mark III is built and the fact of how fast it can take an image. The 7D has higher pixel count but the battery charge time is limited.more than I prefer. Can anyone shed some insight on either of these two cameras?</p>

<p>Just tossing a little salt on the subject. I could get a Tamron 28-75mm f2.8, which works on both film and digital along with a Tokina 100mm f2.8 for less than the cost of the Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 or the Sigma 50-150mm f2.8. Yes it would not be as long 150mm but I could possibly cover my need to have 2 lenses that I could move from one camera to the other, and both of those lenses have the ability to take very detailed photos. I have owned both of those lenses and enjoyed the results I achieved with either of them, and I could still take my girl out to dinner and have enough change left to leave a decent tip.</p>

<p>So a better choice in a similar price range would be the Nikon 80-200mm f2.8. I believe this lens would be compatible with both my D200 and the fabulous F5. This discussion appeared to drift in a really awkward direction so let me state my initial question was directed toward taking great photos, not just any photos. I do not go out with any camera to just snap up pictures. I go out every day with the intent of taking the best photos to date. I was seeking a lens that would be compatible on both film and digital cameras. I know it is not an easy task but for me one quite worth the trouble of finding and using. The Sigma line of lenses are now being made of higher quality and which are able to compete with the big boys. The 50-150mm would/could be a great range to work within. Who know, I might get it just to see just how good it can be.</p>

<p>I am thinking of buying the Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM APO Lens. My question is will this lens also work on my Nikon F5 Camera as well as my Nikon D200?</p>

<p>This all started when I began downsizing my camera collection so I pulled out everything I own and found some cameras and lenses I had almost forgotten about. When I saw the Canon EOS IX I remember the attention it drew from others and the great photos it took. With a lens mount capable of using almost all Canon lenses it was hard to resist. I recently popped on a Sigma 50mm f1.4 and once again was amazed at the clarity and the vivid colors. But I am sticking with my decision to move away from Canon equipment over to Nikon. Just my personal choice for the moment, so the XTi, both Eos 5 (film bodies), Tokina 100mm f2.8, Tokina 35mm f2.8, Canon 28-135mm IS, 50mm f1.8 MK-I (Metal Base), Canon 28mm f1.8, Canon 85mm f1.8, Tamron 28-75mm f2.8, the Sigma 50mm f1.4, Vivitar 28-210mm f4.2-6.3 Series 1, and the Tamron 28-200mm lens all must go. I believe I will keep the EOS IX and the Canon AF35ML w/the 40mm f1.9 lens as memories to the past. Will be having a big sale really soon. Thanks for all the comments, I am constantly learning from my own experiences and what I read here provokes a continuous thought process. </p>

<p>Yes I see the dark corners, but did you see them when you were viewing TTL. I have mounted this lens on the Canon EOS IX and while viewing TTL I do not see dark corners whatsoever. Are you saying it will appear on the film image what I do not see in the viewfinder?</p>

<p>Will a lens designed to work on small sensor digital cameras also work on the old APS Film bodies? I have a Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD IF Lens for Canon mount and would like to know if it is compatable with the Canon EOS IX APS Film body? I believe it could be a great combination of size and usefullness if they work hand in hand with one another.</p>

<p>I am using an 81A Filter on my lens attached to a 35mm film camera (Nikon F5). My question concerning how to set exposure compensation is as follows. With the Hoya 81A filter attached do I set my exposure compensation +1/3 stop or -1/3 stop? I will be using 35mm color negative film listed as iso-100. I have read and observed charts which specify how much I need to compensate, but they never really state if the compensation is to be set as + or -</p>

<p>Will the Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f2.8 Pro FX Lens operate on a Nikon D60 Digital Camera? I shoot both digital and film and would like for the lenses I purchase to operate on both cameras. I understand it will work on my Nikon F5, but will it also work on my Nikon D60?</p>

<p>I am waiting to receive the Sigma 50mm f1.4 in the mail and when I do I will post some of the photos taken with the new Sigma lens. In the mean time I have been experimenting with the Nikon 85mm f1.8 and for me it works great with my Nikon N90s. I don't see the need to spend more money for the small increase in speed, but everyone one day will have to decide when and where to spend their own money and on what. I have heard about, used and sold all the Sigma lenses I have previously owned due to better lenses being readily available. Lately though I have been hearing a different story concerning Sigma products which is why I choose to get the 50mm Sigma. Less out of pocket cost for a very similar product. I will place it on my Minolta 800si film camera. Wish me luck. If I can ad a photo it came from my Nikon N90s and Nikkor 85mm f1.8 lens.</p>

<div></div>

<p>I saw this post awhile back and had been looking around for one of Minolta's best kept secrets, the Maxxum 9xi. What I found out in December 2012 is the prices can vary and so can the amount of wear and tear each Maxxum 9xi can have. So I just waited for the right time and the right opportunity and lo and behold it happen for me this week. I found a Minolta Maxxum 9xi in excellent condition for the whopping price of, drum roll, $41.99. I had a lens and a couple of Minolta flashes and have been taking photos ever since. Once I develop the first roll I will process those photos and post them here and on Flickr. I believe some of the Minolta products are <strong><em>The Best Kept Secret </em></strong>around. I will have to see how this 9xi and my 800si perform against the Nikon N90s. The experiment continues.</p><div></div>