![](http://content.invisioncic.com/l323473/set_resources_2/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
fabiano
-
Posts
656 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by fabiano
-
-
<p>Agree with Michael, you can register your domain and point it to photo.net.</p>
-
-
<p>Thanks guys,<br>
Patrick, my demand is too low for afford these models. Initially I just wish "to give a try".</p>
-
<p>Hi,<br>
I'm looking for someplaces in US or even Europe to do some fine-art print for my own photos.<br>
Basically, B&W on high gramature paper in A3 format.<br>
Any tips?</p>
<p> </p>
-
<p>I have a sharp edge foreground and a slight blurred background, I want to select the foreground...any ideas? Want to try some smarter than lasso selection...<br>
I was trying >High Pass> let the image with the borders I want to select, then > Selection> color range > selected the 50% gray > than inverted the mask.<br>
Thanks,</p>
-
<p>Thank you all guys,<br>
Jaycob, it seems that you pushed the Magenta a little too much here, in my monitor.<br>
So you all agree that it is matter of luminosity of green and not saturation or color cast (where it only should be green)?<br>
I will try the exposure compensation idea...</p>
<p> </p>
-
<p>I'm having problems to correct my greens, they are not real, too bright. <br>
My best attempt was to decrease the luminance data from green channel.<br>
BTW, I only have compact cameras so RAW is not an option.<br>
Any opinions?<br>
<strong>Original</strong><br>
<img src="http://i44.tinypic.com/331imvr.jpg" alt="" /><br>
<strong>Corrected</strong><br>
<img src="http://i43.tinypic.com/i3gvvm.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="450" /></p>
<p> </p>
-
<p>Hello people,<br>
I took <a href="../photo/8720996">this photo </a>framing the foreground statue like it was looking to the other "couple" statues, But the background is very busy and the image don't transmit this feeling.<br>
I tried to isolate them by constrast, darkning the background and making the statues brighter, but I'm not satisfied withthe results. BTW: dodge and burn with softlight layer filled with grey 50% and black and white brushes.<br>
The idea just don't work in a so extreme way as I think?</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/8720996"></a></p><div>
</div>
-
<p>Thank you all,<br>
I just want to understand better the theory, not pratical problem related...<br>
Although I coldn't express my doubt, the links answered my questions...thanks</p>
-
<p>I understand that when you got a 12 bit RAW file you have 4096 tones between black and white, the first 2048 are in first STOP, 1024 on second and so.<br>
This is a way to say that each aperture you have less light and less sensibility of sensor, but in the SAME APERTURE the fact that camera record more tones of highlights than shadows is just a matter of sensor behavior associated with some non-linearity?<br>
Sorry if this was already asked...couldn't find on archives</p>
Difference on HTML and Flash, not smooth images
in Website Creation
Posted
<p>Hello,<br>
I used Vuvox as my primary flash slide show in a project I have:<br>
<a href="http://www.fabiano-silva.com/girls.html">http://www.fabiano-silva.com/girls.html</a> Contains Partial Nudity!<br>
Due to slow loading issues I want to change it for HTML, however in my fist attempt I noted images "flick" due to screen renovation and flash slide show not. Yes, I'm using CRT monitor:<br>
<a href="http://fabiano-silva.com/girls/girls.html">http://fabiano-silva.com/girls/girls.html</a> Contains Partial Nudity!<br>
Anyone can note this? Is there any easy fix?<br>
Thank you all!<br>
Fabiano</p>
<p> </p>