evrim_icoz

February 26, 2003

This is an excellent photograph, but I do not see why the photographer insists the background blur is due to full aperture. It is clearly visible in the camera left arm of the girl some area left unblurred.

December 12, 2002

I love the lines in this image. The blur effect is somewhat distracting, still a great photo.

November 24, 2002

This is not a good photo. Look, the cropping is bad, there is no expression, no movement, nothing to suggest a dance. I am a dancer and dance photographer, and have seen lots of dance photographs. This is not one of them.

November 19, 2002

I think the photographer is actually quite talented. There are *much* better photographs in the portfolio. Seems like anything taken with real b&w gets 100 additional points :)

November 13, 2002

I didn't do much sharpening, it might look a bit soft. I like it that

way for the water, giving it a soft, 'mild' look... Yes the sky does

not have the 1/3rd positioning but then I am perfectly ok with that,

bringing the water to a bit more prominent role and accentuating the

textures.

October 5, 2002

too centered?

October 5, 2002

Very good photo. About the only thing that I would fix is the reflection at the back. Maybe a softer light source or just plain old Photoshop?

October 5, 2002

Great model. A reflector to camera right would open up the hair. The right arm seems very awkward, maybe on the hips?

September 16, 2002

Looks artifical.

September 3, 2002

Nice lighting, good tonality. A little burn on the face would be better, like on his left cheek. I am also not very crazy about his shoulder, if he was leaning back a bit, that shoulder line would be lower. Overall very nice.

September 3, 2002

Is this a man praying? I am not sure If i get a sense of who this person is...

September 3, 2002

I think this is a very nice photo. It can be pumped by increasing saturation/contrast a bit, and I think there is a slight haze to it. I also wish I could see the left arm. Overall a nice capture.