tscheung

<p>which type of adaptors is better, with or without len?</p>

<p>zenitar 16 mm f2.8 for 5d<br />this len for 5d, can anybody tell me the difference?<br>

<br />M42 + eos adapter<br />eos mount<br />which one is better?<br />thanks a lot</p>

<p>Thanks Puppy<br>

it means I cannot check by myself, and need send to Canon CS.</p>

<p>Thanks Cesar,<br>

someone told me, this cam have a function to check the record, but not sure.<br>

as you said that, I assumed 36 exposures per each roll, can I?</p>

<p>Want to buy a 1v body, can someone help me how to check the shutter count?<br>

Thanks</p>

17-40f4 + remote & tripod

Hi Henderson,

i agreed with you some of your points. but as you said that

"Everything you put on a SQA-i is a little heavier than the equivalent of the ETRs-i. Which brings me to the point that the biggest influence on weight is not the native weight of the body only, but what you decide to put on it. Prisms are useful but weighty, Speedgrips are useful but weighty, and theres a decent difference between the weights of lenses. Outfit weight will depend more on how many lenses and accessories, and even the weight of the bag itself, than on whether the heart of the system is a 645 or 6x6 camera."

i assumed Waugh consider that compare with different formats, but, with a full system, same focus length of lens, same acessories etc., and for me, just personally, why i selected 645, the reasons are:

1. as the cam & lens are relative small, light and more portable

2. 6x6, the format can be limiting for general use, such as when shooting landscapes, architecture and so on, as most published pics are cropped to rectangles, for this reason, so why many pros. they are used to 67, espl. most popular RB or RZ because one of reasons the revolving back, instant change from V to H.

sq is a bit heavy, i borrowed my friend's sqai (for studio), after compared, bought the etrsi due to i often shot the outdoors, travell & wedding. now, want to upgrade to 6x7, may be GS or RZ, although i have a 5D, the digital output still missed something, for me, especial B&W pictures.

but bigger is better.

no difference between them just format

 

tak

all lens are works

Hello Derek,

I am still looking for a 40mm, MC or PE, how good of them? If you have any information, please send to me.

And, any information about AIII finder? Can anyone help?

Thanks

The 80-200f2.8 ATX PRO Golden ring, I have this len, the images quality is shape, but, AF speed is slow and heavy, so upgarded to 70-200f4 IS, and the 28-70f2.6-2.8 & 28-80f2.8 both lenes provide excellent pictures, mainly for wedding portraits.

I have 5d and 40d, and 24-105, want to buy the 24-70 L, for me too heavy, and f/2.8 IS, I known this len is EFS, but, up to now, still the one and only one choice from canon, is a bit stupid? Any more suggestions?

Thanks

Thanks all

Hello,

Want to buy a battery pack for 550 and 580 speedlites, because need faster recycles times for indoor events, which

one is better 1) CP-E3, 2) Qflashes SC

Any suggestions?

Hello,

Want to buy a len range like 17-55 f2.8, for indoors and dim light events, can anybody tell me how good this len?

Thanks

Hello all,

how good the canon 17-55 f2.8?

I am planning to buy this or Tamron.

Hello all,

my case as well as Hans, how good this len?

coca-cola vs pepsi,

use a self-sealing plastic bag (see-though type), it works, I always use this method when shots in a raining days

If you do a lot of interior works, why not consider upgrade to a FF body?

I would suggest: 18-55 and 24-70 f2.8L (eqt. 40-100, as a mid-rang tele, for FF body)

focus range from 10 to 150mm for crop factor body, my suggestions are:

optn 1: 10-20 or 12-24 and nikon 24-120

optn 2: 18-200 and 35 f/2

for me, it does not work very well!