Jump to content

larry_albert

Members
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by larry_albert

  1. Don,

     

    <p>

     

    What luck, I just came to MFD from the Mamiya pages and had been reading how to order a manual.

     

    <p>

     

    ***** Start of snipped copy from Mamiya's page ****

    Since Mamiya receives many inquiries on obtaining

    instruction booklets for cameras, we are listing this

    information here for Forum users.

     

    <p>

     

    Instruction booklets for current and discontinued Mamiya

    cameras are priced at $8 each, including first-class postage

    to anywhere within the US.

     

    <p>

     

    ***** End of snipped copy from Mamiya's page *****

    URL - http://mamiya.com/cgi-bin/WebX?13@^2496@.ee6b860

     

    <p>

     

    Go to the above page for instructions about where to send your money.

     

    <p>

     

    Their home page mamiya. com has a link to User Forum which

    then has a link for Older Mamiya Cameras lots of discussions of the

    220 and 330 cameras. User Forum will also link you to Ordering

    Instruction Manuals

     

    <p>

     

    Good luck,

     

    <p>

     

    Larry

  2. George,

     

    <p>

     

    Bay1 filters for the Roelli are still listed as available in

    the latest B&H Photo catalog. B+W offers Bay 1 filters

    and calls them size B1. I did not find any Bay 1 filters in

    the Tiffen listings.

     

    <p>

     

    B&H web address follows ---

     

    <p>

     

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/photo/filters/navigation.html ---

     

    <p>

     

    Hope this helps. B+W may be your only choice for new

    Bay 1 filters. Yes B+W filters do cost more than other

    brands. Are they worth it? I am not going to start that

    fight.

     

    <p>

     

    Good luck,

    Larry

  3. William Ju (wju@ibm.net)

    Report on Fuji 670

     

    <p>

     

    For a discussion of the Fuji 617 you should read the report from a

    satisfied user - Philip Greenspun of photo.net.

     

    <p>

     

    Go to his site (address follows)

    http://www.photo.net/photo/index.html

    About half way down the page you will find the following;

    Fuji 617: Want to have panoramic negatives bigger than

    most folks' proof prints?

     

    <p>

     

    That link will take you to:

    Fuji 617 by Philip Greenspun for photo.net.

    http://www.photo.net/photo/fuji-617.html

     

    <p>

     

    Hope this helps,

     

    <p>

     

    Larry

  4.  

     

    Use the focal length of the lens you are using.

     

    <p>

     

    If you use the "equivalent focal length in 35mm" the resulting hyperfocal distance will be for a

    lens of that focal length PERIOD, not the length you are actually using.. The formulae for

    hyperfocal distance do not include anything about the film size.

     

    <p>

     

    You can get formulae for the hyperfocal distances and put them into a spread sheet and calculate

    the ones YOU need. Several links follow that have the formula you want and other formulae that

    might be of interest.

     

    <p>

     

    **** This first link is simple and straight forward. *****

     

    <p>

     

    http://www.photo.net/philg/photo/optics/lensFAQ.html

     

    <p>

     

    **** Here is Question 9 copied from that link. *****

     

    <p>

     

    Q9. What is hyperfocal distance?

     

    <p>

     

    A. The closest distance that is in acceptable focus when the lens is

    focused at infinity. (See below for a variant use of this term.)

     

    <p>

     

    h = f^2/(N*c)

     

    <p>

     

    *** Larry is adding information starting here

     

    <p>

     

    f = focal length of the lens

    N = f stop (the one being used - not lens maximum aperture)

    c = diameter of the "circle of confusion"

    h = hyperfocal distance

     

    <p>

     

    NOTE: ALL dimensions above are in millimeters. If you want hyperfocal distance to be in feet

    or meters you must include a conversion factor.

     

    <p>

     

    end of the information that Larry added.*****

     

    <p>

     

    ***** formula for "depth of field" calculations are also at this link *****

     

    <p>

     

    Some more links which have similar information follow in this posting.

     

    <p>

     

    ***** Two more links from http://www.photo.net/philg/photo/optics/lensFAQ.html the home page

    of "Willem-Jan Markerink" w.j.markerink@a1.nl I am listing the links because his server has

    not been sending the entire page. The problem is know and being worked on.

     

    <p>

     

    A nice program for calculating 'Depth of Field' and 'Field of View':

    http://waterworks.com./~tfv/dmatic.htm DOF & FOV

     

    <p>

     

    Another DOF calculator:

    http://swissnet.ai.mit.edu/photo/

     

    <p>

     

    **** Another link from http://www.photo.net/photo the site of Philip Greenspun *****

     

    <p>

     

    http://www.photo.net/photo/optics/lensTutorial.html

     

    <p>

     

    You will discover that there is no universal agreement on the correct size for the

    "circle of confusion." All hyperfocal distance and depth of field calculations require

    that you include a value for the "circle of confusion." Q8 from the first length gives

    a simple explanation for the "circle of confusion."

     

    <p>

     

    Hope this helps,

     

    <p>

     

    Larry

×
×
  • Create New...