rajesh_kallaje

<p>Thanks Kaar, I have been thinking of post processing of RAW files and am beginning to do that now. Else you are right :-)</p>

<p>Dear Sebastian, Michael Bradtke, Rodeo, Antonio, Mike, Wayne and SHun, thanks a lot for the help and suggestions. Dear Rodeo, I downloaded the viewnx2 software and the magenta/red tinge is not visible there but for one converted photo from RAW to JPEG which I have shared with you all. Will try to find out the reason now. Usually I don't process the photos at all except cropping/filling light/shadowing. Thanks once again for the help.</p>

<p>I agree with Wayne about RAW but what I am saying is about a clear red wash over the RAW images and RAW images only. JPEG pix are normal. And these RAW images are unusable and cannot be processed into a better image just like how you can't perfectly sharpen a blurry image.</p><div></div>

<p>I just transferred the pictures into my computer and open the pictures in the card only and the tinge was visible. Then I transferred the images to picasa photo editor and it was again very clear.</p>

<p>Hi all, got a new D 7200 today and tried taking pictures. When I transferred the photos to computers, I discovered that all RAW pictures had a reddish tinge which covered the entire photo. The tinge also made the photo dull. The pictures are unusable. This was not found in JPEG files and they are quite normal and results in JPEG are excellent. I am unable to make out the reason. Something that I am doing wrong? I did not face any such issue while using the same lenses with Nikon D 7000.</p>

<p>Thanks Shun and Greg. My worry is that it is difficult use 200-500 while on treks and walks. Ans also does it have the quality of 300 mm prime? I am not a professional but I am a forester and have lots of opportunities to shoot birds and large mammals. Will 420 mm (300 mm + 1.4 TC) or 600 mm on D7000 too less for wildlife including birds? </p>

<p>Recently I tried out the Nikon 300 mm f/4 PF ED VR lens and was really impressed with the results. The pictures came out crisp, colours were great and of course there was no need to use a tripod. But occasionally I rued the lack of flexibility in zoom. Now we hear about the new 200-500 lens. I understand that buying a lens is mostly a compromise but for wildlife photography, will this new zoom lens give the same output as a prime? Or is the compromise in quality not much when compared with the flexibility of a zoom? I am not a professional photographer and use a Nikon D7000. I carry my camera and lenses in a backpack when I go for treks or walks. I am eager to hear suggestions from users. Thanks. </p>