konstantinos_athanasiadis1664881385

<p>How about Eizo SX2462WFS-BK ?</p>

<p>Hello everyone. I need a little help chosing a new monitor for photo processing. I determined to buy an EIZO monitor as the lab i print uses EIZO, and i guess i will get closer results for my prints. I am looking for 24 inch monitor or even better a 27 inch. depending on the price always, whicj\h I want to limit as low as spossible. Is there any monitor qualified for photoworks, may it be an older version, an 27 inch, not exceeding 700 euros ?<br /> 24 inches will do if I do not find a suitable 27 inch monitor at that price rangw<br />with regards<br /><br />www.constantin.gr</p>

<p>How does the clarity help ? What I am interseted in, is how to get those white higlights on the veil, is it done using the dodge tool ? Thanks ffor your help ?</p>

<p>I have not tried it out yet, but If you have a preset that matches that outcome I do have an interest in it...What I can not achieve is ti inverse the layermask so that only the shadows are selected, And what is a yellow fill on Hue ?</p>

<p>I have not tried it out yet, but If you have a preset that matches that outcome I do have an interest in it...</p>

<p>

<p ></p>

<p > I stumbled upon an image taken by Andrea Joki, it is the Photoshop effect that I am after, displayed at <a href="http://www.designaglowblog.com/?p=702">http://www.designaglowblog.com/?p=702</a> <br />the title is “ Version 1 Sultry”. A layermask is used and the highlights are selected, after that the layermask is inverted, and that is something I can not achieve. Can anyone help me with this look?</p>

</p>

<p>I was thinking of <br>

Western Digital -Caviar Green 1TB HDD (32MB Cache, Sata, WD10EADS)<br>

as a technician told me that drives with high rpm tend to fail easier htan those with 7200 rpm<br>

I will use a ssd drive for my windows, and use a different drive for all my other software.<br /> then I will have a drive as WORKING GROUND - and do a double back on two Western Digital -Caviar Green.</p>

 

<p>Guess I will have to do some further research..</p>

<p ><!-- [if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:DontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --><!-- [if gte mso 10]> <mce:style><!-- /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Κανονικός πίνακας"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} --> <!-- [endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026"/> </xml><![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit"> <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1"/> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->I am willing to spend from 1000 to 1400 € </p>

<p >I also heard that Sapphire's 5870 is supporting Directx 11.</p>

<p >Is that really necessary for Photoshop and Lightroom - running simultaneously ? </p>

<p >Is 12 Gb to much ? and is even the quad core to much? </p>

 

<p>Whic\\\\\Was it the ASUS P6T ?</p>

<p>Hello. I intend to buy the i7-920, I need a suitable motherboard, and a Graphic card, probably the Sapphire 4890 Vapor x 2Gb, or the former 4870 2Gb + RAM DDR3 - Do not care about Overclocking as I need them for Photoshop and Lightroom, Heard that vista and 64 bit is the only way to reach12Gb , do not no though if any system without OC can surpass 8Gb. Anyway which motherboard do you suggest and which grapic card?<br>

What I do now is that my set up has to be tripple channel. <br>

Will the CPU recognize the 12Gb RAM ?<br>

Is Intels motherboards more suitable than<strong> </strong> Assus P6T SE ?<br>

Is RAM at 1333MHz</p>

 

<p>Is that not strange as they are two different brands from two different countries ?</p>

<p>I guess Pocketwizards it is, as I need a transmitter tranceiver for my 580EXII as well, altough the cost is high, I heard that Canons transmitter is not that good. and I can probably not use Hensels transmitter for my Speedlight as it can't receive its signals. Pocketwizard, right ?</p>

<p ><br /> Is it possible to use the MicroSync Digital 4 Channel Radio Slave and a Monoplug Receiver on a 5D to trigger my off camera 580EXII speedlight ? I would also like to know if they are compatible with my Hensels Expert PRO 500 Plus that already have built in radio tranceiver ? And is it possible to use the MicroSync transmitter from my 5D to trigger the strobe mentioned ? With the help of the tranceiver ?<br /> </p>

<p > </p>

<p>Things are clearer for me now. Thanks for taking time explaining. I did not know that lenses had a better/worse focal performance, altough I had heard in the pas tabout their aperture performances.<br /> And, tripod it will be, when such an occasion appears again.<br /> Thanks</p>

<p>Thank you William W. You are right anbout having the mirror up, is the tripod a neccesity though, if say I have a shutterspeed of 250 ? And why is the lens at its worse when at 70 mm ?<br /> Of course if I had a large format....</p>

<p>No, I wanted a minimalistic look to my theme. I wanted it exactly as you saw it. But ! I wanted more resolution. (I shot at f/11 at least) with 100 ISO. but I believe that my 24-70 L lens was capable, but maybe i needed a 17 Mp Canon body, to print on a canvas with, a 1.5 meters width.<br /> Do you agree with that ?</p>

<p>Could I have used a 70 - 200 lens, and just backed up several meters, as the area did allow me to. ?Or was it that the 5D did not give me the resolution I needed for an enlargement ?</p>

<p>Truth is that I prefer the 70 to 200F2.8L IS but the price range, it quit a distance for me at the time, cant decide, I need the telephoto for outdoor mainly. I have an image in my gallery taken at a field and a mountain in the background, having the couple walking towards a tree... unfortunately I can't make an enlargment as my 24-70L lens and my Canon 5D didn't allow for better resolution and enlargement. Could have used a 70-200f4 there.</p><div></div>

<p>thanks everyone !</p>

<p>Thakns Colin and great images you make.<br /> What do you think about the 100 - 400 lens ? Is it suitable for some long-distance portraits or landscape photography-with a couple in the distance. ?</p>

<p> I found two lenses that I consider, the "EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM for SLR Cameras " and the "EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM for Digital SLR Cameras" the first lens, is it not suitable for a digital camera ? I intend to use it for my 5D camera.<br /> I am a photographer shooting mainly weddings, perhaps it is odd for a wedding photograpger to use a 100-400 lens for a wedding, but still !<br /> With regards.</p>

I have a question. I own two Hensel 500 PRO plus, I was thinking of getting a generator and or battery for them for location photography, I friend of mine told me that there is an issue concerning the number of flashes you can get from a battery before it gets low on power ? Which brand would be the better one, giving the most flahes at say full power ?

A very insightful article, more than a simple bravo for NiK Guy, who spent time,the ever so valuable, to write this down. A must in my library.

I did some more test shots with the assistance of my fiance, and the results were positive, I am a happy photographer.<div></div>

Terry and Dan, thanks. One more thing, the manual for my speedlight says that ETTL wont work with type B cameras, trying too find out if my 400D is a type B camera. thing is that I did turn it over to TTL and the results were quit better. perhaps that was the solutions, but I am reading your links as we speak.