graham_marsden
-
Posts
98 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by graham_marsden
-
-
Hi folks,
I bought this old Vivitar on e-bay for under 30 pounds sterling. Oh boy ! Am
I having fun with it on my D80. Made in Japan and of metal construction so
it weighs a lot. But being completely manual, when I've focussed, it stays
focussed without any annoying 'hunting'. And no worrying about a silly
autofocus square being in exactly the right place.
Plus of course a 'depth of field' scale on the lens barrel, so you can decide
exactly what you want. And with my bird, and flower pictures I can mess about
until I'm happy with the bokeh.
We old fogeys deserve some fun I guess !
.
-
Another vote for the 50mm f1.8. I'm keen on 'flower-pictures' and I find that at f2.2 the background is blurred just the right amount. Enough to suggest the environment because I really dislike the current taste for backgrounds that look as if they have been 'guassian blurred' in photoshop. Buy the lens and you will be surprised how much you use it.
As has been said, at f8 it's sharpness is legendary. cheers Graham
-
Couldn't agree more Kevin. The effect looks very dated nowadays.
It was just that Chad wanted to know how to do it.......... <IMG SRC="http://mars.walagata.com/w/radiogandy/Icons/photo.gif">
-
This is easy in Photoshop. Go Image>Adjustments>Hue/Saturation. Then simnply desaturate each colour in turn except red. Much easier than having to paint a mask. And you can always give the 'red' a tweak while you are in there. Here is an example. Not an award-winner but done in minutes just for this post.
<IMG SRC="http://mars.walagata.com/w/radiogandy/CIMG4269_copy.jpg">
The other way would be to 'Select' the apple by whatever tool you use for selections, then go 'select'> 'inverse' and turn the rest of the picture into monochrome
-
I use my Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM a lot and I consider the results first class, particularly if you are prepared to do a little photoshoppery at the side edges to straighten things. There isn't a vignetting problem but you can't use it on a 'film' camera though
But you might have higher standards than me. In the price range you are considering it isn't expensive.
.
-
Hi Joe....You are quite right. It doesn't work, all menus greyed out. Ah well - another bright idea goes up in smoke!
-
There is so much to commend the 'Retouch Menu' in my D80. Particularly the
'D-lighting' (no telltale selection marks how ever much you zoom in) and 'colour
balance' (which in my opinon outshines the photoshop CS2 tool).
I also have a Casio Compact that uses SD cards. What if I transferred a card
from the Casio into the D80 and worked on the images before downloading to my PC?
Would it work? Or would there be some ramifications?
-
Nikon D-80
in Nikon
I've had my D80 almost a year now and the sensor hasn't yet needed cleaning. My tips are:
1. Switch camera off when changing lenses.
2. Don't leave the lens-less body hole up in dusty environments.
It's a great camera........<IMG SRC="http://mars.walagata.com/w/radiogandy/Icons/photo.gif">
-
It's difficult to recommend one rather than the other because you are not comparing like with like. If it is a 'one lens to take travelling' you would certainly miss having nothing wider than 35mm in my opinion.
And the 18-70mm is an excellent lens.
.
-
A slight problem with the Sigma 10-20mm is it's digital camera only.
This .........
<IMG SRC="http://mars.walagata.com/w/radiogandy/_DSC6739.jpg">
was on the Sigma 12-24mm which you can also use on a film camera, if you ever need to. The kitchen picture isn't an award winner, just to demonstrate,
-
I know it isn't exactly what the poster asked but, I'm with Lex on this one.
<i>'Softness'</i> is a strange concept anyway and the degree of <i>sharpness</i> you find desirable varies. I have a middle-aged Casio compact which produces attractively 'soft' images; compared to my Nikkor lenses on my D80. And often they are the more attractive.
-
<IMG SRC="http://mars.walagata.com/w/radiogandy/Icons/456.gif"> Brian Y can put me in the 'stupid' category I think. Regularly recurring questions are a problem shared by most 'technical advice' forums and everyone should be patient and considerate.
Like articles in camera magazines - the same theme is returned to often for the benefit of newcomers who want to learn. . I always consider this forum a supportive, friendly and helpful place and the idea that <i> "the moderators could summarily delete all stupid questions"</i> appals me and I wouldn't be around too long.
-
Thanks very much fellas. Just the answers I needed. I <b>will</b> do a search Bruce, of the lenses Matt suggests. And Matthew's reommendation <i?"....results produce more 'keepers' ....</i> says it all !
Thanks again......
-
I need a good landscape lens for my D80. The widest I've got is my Nikkor
18-70mm. Research tells me that lenses designed for digitals (<i>i.e. having
DC in the title</i>) are better. I don't really understand the terminology but
is there anything in this point?
Quality is more inportant to me than cheapness. Recommendations would be most
helpful. <IMG SRC="http://mars.walagata.com/w/radiogandy/Icons/Undecided_0.gif">
-
-
Eric is correct. I have a 50mm prime, and a 70-300zoom, but my Nikkor 18-70mm is the one that lives on my D80. For a general 'work-horse' it is difficult to beat.
.
-
The Nikkor 18-70mm is a great general purpose lens.
.
-
You would be better rolling dollar bills into balls, and flicking them at passers by. It would be more fun than owning this heap of junk !
<IMG SRC="http://www.clicksmilies.com/s1106/alles_moegliche/mixed-smiley-004.gif">
-
The D80 was my first DSLR venture after compacts and I've been delighted with it. I guess I was lucky because it was bundled with the Nikkor 18-70mm which is a great lens.
In my opinion too much is made of its tendency to over-expose. It does, a bit, but I have -0.7 keyed in more or less permanently. You don't need to key it in each day; the camera remembers. And the camera's other attributes far outweigh this minor niggle.
I can't comment on whether or not the D80 will shortly be replaced. This happens all the time in the camera world and if you bothered about it, you would never buy a camera at all.
.
.<IMG SRC="http://mars.walagata.com/w/radiogandy/Icons/photo.gif">
-
Horace said in 45BC :-
.......<i>"When I labour to be brief I become obscure"</i>.......
Ergo, Just tell 'em.
.
-
For my D80 I have Kenko tubes and a reversing ring for my Nikkor 50m. I'm not an expert but one point to ponder is that wth the reversing ring you get no metering at all, and it is hit and miss until you get an acceptable exposure. My rings permit normal, through the lens, metering which is a boon.
.
-
If you are on a Mac I don't know. But in Windows XP if you go Start>My Computer>insert card. When it shows open it. If you hover over the folder/ or folders - it should tell you what is on there.
.
-
Nikon info
in Nikon
I have Photoshop CS2 but for a quick boost or B&W conversion Picasa is great. My D80 gives me more than adequate B&W shooting, you can even convert to a cyanotype if you want.
And, in my opinion, the D80's in-camera colour balance is better than Photoshop's because the histograms are there in view during any adjustments you care to make.
-
I am with Shun Cheung on this one. The D80 wasn't designed to be a pro camera hence its price tag. What does a fleck of dust matter anyway? Or a hot pixel, particularly on the LCD which you should only be using to check composition etc.,it isn't a 42" plasma job is it. If you see them on your PC Monitor use either the spot healing tool, or the clone stamp in Photoshop, or similar. And enjoy what for my money, is a fine camera for which Nikon should be congratulated.
<IMG SRC="http://mars.walagata.com/w/radiogandy/Icons/photo.gif">
Ancient manual Vivitar 200mm f3.5
in Nikon
Posted
Certainly no need to apologise. It developed into an interesting thread about earlier lenses, which I've much enjoyed reading.
I've tried to find some actual reviews for my Vivitar but so far haven't been successful. I also hoped that I might get lucky with a manual from Old Timer Cameras. But unfortunately no.
Links would be really welcomed !