Jump to content

brian_kurotsuchi

Members
  • Posts

    155
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by brian_kurotsuchi

    Break

          3

    Cool, but you ask for a critique... Well, neither plane is centered in the frame, and/or worse, one plane is cut in half. It would have worked better to either have both planes fully in the frame or only the banking one. Having both planes would be nice for experiencing the moment, since you'd be able to see that one plane was doing something radically different.

     

    You caught a great moment though - the bank, wingtip trail. At 400mm, you were probably glad that the plane was even in the frame... Your image has good clarity, which is of course critical for this.

    Sweet Afternoon

          2
    Depth of field is a little funny. It's not a narrow depth, nor is it all in focus. I find the (right) foreground a bit irritating. Excellent exposure and sharpness though.

    Henry Singer

          3
    I like the various shadows and the color. I'm not sure if I like the fence in the foreground and my eye notices how there are vertical lines which don't look vertical. Great photo though.
  1. This is some great B&W film, it captures color! You must have the attributes for this image set wrong... I really like this image. It would be better if you captured the entire shadow of the lamp though. Just one step backwards.

    "Roadhog"

          1
    Neat photo. I like the colors and the combination of blur and stability. It's too bad that the left and right banks don't look symmetrically blurred because the bushes are too dark. Your title is good too. :)

    Untitled

          7
    I love it! Simple, with interesting contrast on different parts of the "humps". You can see the grains. Maybe the weeds need some work though, either show more of them or crop them out.
×
×
  • Create New...