Jump to content

jim_bob12

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jim_bob12

  1. <p>A fairly recently acquired OM-4 which is mostly excellent...<br>

    I'm getting an underexposed band down the right hand side of the frame, it only appears on shots taken at 1/125 - seems fine faster or slower. Is this shutter bounce or shutter capping? It's a very well defined line and extends into the frame from the right-hand side about 8mm.<br>

    It's been in for repair a couple of times, but still does it. Any ideas?</p>

    <p>Thanks</p>

    <p>Jim</p>

    <p> </p><div>00aP3N-467183584.jpg.f73ddc3c1a5ba468fd484c622348a759.jpg</div>

  2. <p>It's not under warranty unfortunately, i've done the adjustment myself using this as a reference <a href="http://www.richcutler.co.uk/r-d1/r-d1_16.htm">http://www.richcutler.co.uk/r-d1/r-d1_16.htm</a> it's for the RD-1, but they have the same rangefinder mechanism as the later Bessa's.<br>

    It's not something i'd like to do too often - a repair man job next time i think.<br>

    Infinity is now spot-on, close focussing with the rangefinder still matches the distance markings on the lens - but i guess i'll have wait and see with the next roll to make sure!</p>

  3. <p>Horizontal alignment is out on my R2a, this hasn't really been an issue with 50mm lenses - close focus is spot-on.</p>

    <p>I'm about to start using an Elmar 9cm however, not reaching infinity is likely to cause problems with longer focal lengths isn't it?</p>

    <p>Can infinity focus (horizontal alignment) be adjusted without affecting close-focus?</p>

    <p>Thanks</p>

    <p>Jim</p>

  4. <p>The rough silver line that would be closest to the film (just above the film rail in the pic) isn't that obvious to the eye but has shown up in the picture quite a lot. This seems the most likely culprit, some carefully applied matt black paint may be the answer - i'll give it a go.</p>
  5. <p>That's my thinking too, which way does the shutter travel in an OM? right to left? Even with the good camera, you can occasionally see the same faint line on the right edge of the print - that would be the left edge looking in the back of the camer wouldn't it?<br>

    The most obvious shiny bit looking in the back of the camera with the shutter open, is some (what looks like) glue holding a felt strip in place, there's one at the top too, but the glue is more obvious on the bottom. This is not present on the left and right sides though - so possibly not the main cause.</p><div>00WE4N-236209584.jpg.071bf4ee4626b3664c8fa965865e9f78.jpg</div>

  6. <p>That could be possible with the second example - this was shot a few years ago, i developed everything in a Jobo CPE2 back then. Now i always develop by hand and use semi-stand agitation, three inversions every three minutes, and plastic reels. I'll see what my next roll looks like. Thanks for all the suggestions - hopefully i'll get tho the bottom of this soon - and learn a thing or two as well!</p>
  7. <p>I'm positive it's internal reflections, film is always new and processed within a couple of days.<br>

    Any ideas how these reflections can be reduced or eliminated? The OM-2n is the older camera and seen a lot more action, 79 or 80 i think, but it looks fairly clean inside and works perfectly otherwise.</p>

  8. <p>When printing full-frame from my OM-2n there is usually a rough white border just inside the film rebate. This gets more and more visible with higher contrast, and looks really bad... It is visible in scans and on prints.<br>

    This is also sometimes visible on negatives from my OM-1n, but it is far less and only occurs in certain light situations.<br>

    Can this be fixed? is it internal reflections around the film opening?<br>

    As i like to print full-frame this is really causing a headache! any help would be gratly appreciated.</p>

    <p>Thanks<br>

    Jim</p><div>00WDZA-236007584.jpg.7ada29b711a96b9ab1c91b82ff069a4d.jpg</div>

  9. its a resize of a 12 megapixel scan, my scanner is crappy (a Pacific Image Prime Film 3600u), but i still get very fine scans from the same type of film with very little grain - your right though this is significantly grainier than B&W stuff i have shot with Neopan 1600

     

    This is what the grain looks like close-up<div>00HDLr-31043484.jpg.b5a9354b22118cd1cada82d45e4c3040.jpg</div>

  10. Hi folks,

     

    i have just started developing my own C41 negatives and im having some realy

    good and some realy bad results - i just developed this film:

     

    The film was Konica VX100 and it was developed using the Nova press kit (i cant

    seem to find kits with a seperate bleach and fix). I have had some very fine

    results from the same film and chems, but this one is extremely grainy, whats

    up? dead blix?

     

    This is the third film i have developed in the same chems - the first two were

    very good, fine grained.

     

    Thanks

     

    Jim<div>00HD0y-31036684.jpg.350e6c3639cc34a7ccca68092b367a5b.jpg</div>

×
×
  • Create New...