ketchemr
-
Posts
77 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by ketchemr
-
-
<a href="http://www.kcamera.com/" target="_blank">Kenmore Camera</a>
<br>
<a href="http://www.glazerscamera.com/">Glazer's Camera</a>
<br>
<a href="http://www.optechscamera.com/">Optechs Camera Supply</a>
<br>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PhotographyStartToFinish/~6/3"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/PhotographyStartToFinish.3.gif" alt="Photography Start to Finish" style="border:0"></a>
<br>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RandalRKetchemPhotography/~6/1"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/RandalRKetchemPhotography.1.gif" alt="Randal R. Ketchem Photography" style="border:0"></a>
-
Sean: This does not work since Save As... JPEG forces saving as a copy if channels are present.
Steve - if you get an answer to this, PLEASE let me know.
-
I have not used the Huey, but MacWorld gave it a positive view (http://www.macworld.com/2006/07/reviews/huey/index.php). I like its ambient light feature. Any of you actually used this device on a monitor used for photo editing?
-
I am confused by the response that these Hawaiian sea turtles will not bask on land. Here is a shot of a turtle on the Big Island that was about five meters from the water, past lava, up the beach, basking in the sand.<br>
<a href="http://www.rrkphoto.com/cgi/showimage.pl?photoID=d20040111006">Turtle at Pu'uhonua o Honaunau</a>
-
North Cascades National Park is a highly overlooked region and is stunningly beautiful.
-
<a href="http://www.westcoastimaging.com/">West Coast Imaging</a> does a fantastic job. They can print any size you would like, you just may have a large margin on one side. Give them a call.<br>
<br>
As for switching from film to digital, I find that I shoot more, experiment more, and actually play with more images on screen (since they don't have to be scanned). These things made the move from film to digital well worth the cost for me.<br>
<br>
Randy<br>
<a href="http://www.rrkphoto.com">Randal R. Ketchem Photography</a>
-
1. I agree with others that you can check the histogram for exposure. When the sun is in the sky, I tend to use matrix metering with the sun just outside of the frame, then set the composition. This will get you fairly close.<br>
2. Since many sunset shots in Hawaii could contain uneven horizons, multiple exposures joined later will do a better job than an ND. Also, good tip from Laurie Meehan-Elmer in that the show is definitely not over after the sun goes down. You can pull some beautiful colors out of the sky with longer exposures. <a href="http://www.rrkphoto.com/cgi/showimage.pl?photoID=d20040109020">Makaiwa Bay Sunset with Venus</a> is a shot I took on the Big Island several minutes after the sun had set.<br>
3. I think that if you do not stare directly at the sun you should be fine, but you should ask your doctor.<br>
<br>
Enjoy the trip.<br>
Randy
-
I have been to the Big Island several times, and have seen birds everywhere I looked. On the lanai in the morning you just need to sit for a few minutes and will be treated to an orchestra of birds. My parents say that Kauai is even more so. Having not looked for birds specifically I cannot advise you on specific locations, but you will not have to look hard.<br>
For general tour guide advice I would highly recommend two books:<br>
<a href="http://www.wizardpub.com/bigisland/bigisland.html">Hawaii The Big Island Revealed</a><br>
<a href="http://www.wizardpub.com/kauai/kauai.html">The Ultimate Kauai Guidebook</a>
-
I had a free minute, so thought I would check out your site. When a new window opened (first argh) and then filled my 23 inch lcd (second argh), I closed the windows. The openeing shot looked nice, though. Opening a new window is bad design. Forcing a size for that new window is very bad design, unless it is a popup help window or something.
-
I can tell you from experience with the 1280 that you will most likely not like the results of B&W prints using black ink only. I was noticing a slight color tone to some B&W's I was printing, so turned off color. The results were horrible. I looked around online at that time and found that the 1280 needs the colors to produce good shades. You should look at one of the newer printers that have two black inks, like the Epson 2200. Another option is to use monochrome inks, as mentioned here:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/digital_b-w.shtml
but I have not tried this myself.
-
Download a trial version and find out! VueScan is powerful, fast, robust, and updated VERY often. Also, it is a single interface for whatever scanners you might have.
-
[This is a cross post from "Digital Cameras". - RRK]
My wife has a Minolta F100 point and shoot that has started losing its
settings whenever the batteries are replaced (which is quite often
with this camera). A call to Minolta confirmed that the problem is the
internal battery, the replacement of which would cost me $120 and must
be sent to them. Has anyone taken this camera apart? Could you provide
some guidance? Or has anyone seen instructions for replacing the
internal battery?
Thanks,
Randy
-
My wife has a Minolta F100 point and shoot that has started losing its
settings whenever the batteries are replaced (which is quite often
with this camera). A call to Minolta confirmed that the problem is the
internal battery, the replacement of which would cost me $120 and must
be sent to them. Has anyone taken this camera apart? Could you provide
some guidance? Or has anyone seen instructions for replacing the
internal battery?
Thanks,
Randy
-
I do not know if they have a good price, but West Coast Imaging certainly has a great service. Check them out at http://www.westcoastimaging.com/. I have been quite happy with their scans and Fuji Crystal Archive prints. Another service that I have used for printing, but not scanning, is AutumnColor at http://www.autumncolor.com/. They have also done a great job printing.
-
I am going to submit some of my work unsolicited to several greeting card companies.
Should I send prints as they are, with no mounts, or should I mount them somehow, or
maybe even place them in a book of some form? What kind of portfolio submission
materials have you used?
-
-
Actually, I am not entirely sure if their use would be corporate or retail, but I believe their
intent is retail. So, I am glad this distinction was brought up. Also, I have since been told
that multiple calendars would be made, each with a smaller run of about 40K. So it looks
like a fee around $5000 is about right.<br>
<br>
Thanks for the input!
<br>
Randy<br>
<a href="http://www.rrkphoto.com/">Randal R. Ketchem Photography</a>
-
I have been approached concerning the possibility of a company using my work alone to
make a wall calendar. Rights would be for the single year, calendar rights only, with a run
size of around 160K. Any suggestions on what to charge? I have searched around and on
this site and have seen links to FotoQuote and HindSight, but would love to know what
some of you have been paid for such a project. If the answer is that I should get one of
these pricing programs, I will certainly do so, but my reading has indicated that pricing
can vary wildly, so a survey of this community would be helpful.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Randy<br>
<a href="http://www.rrkphoto.com">Randal R. Ketchem Photography</a>
-
That should read, "should NOT".
-
I know that photo.net recompresses, but that should initiate such a strong tonal shift.
-
I posted the same image to both photo.net
(<a
href="http://www.photo.net/photo/2089650&size=lg">photo.net
image</a>),
and usefilm.com
(<a href="http://www.usefilm.com/image/296908.html">usefilm.com
image</a>).
The photo.net image appears darker and more contrasty. Why? Is one
reading the internal profile and the other not? Is one modifying the
image?<br>
<br>
Randy
-
I would love to see a nude filter installed on this site. With the constant nudes being posted and seen in Top Photos, I do not recommend this site to others. I would love to share and support this resource, and this one issue stops me. Actually, this one issue will have me looking at, and supporting, usefilm instead of photo.net. I really like photo.net, though, so would prefer to stay here with filters.
As for the arguments people are making about pre-viewing the site before showing it to a 7 year old, that is crazy. The only option is to not show it to her at all since nudes pop up often and are on dynamic pages.
How to mount slides
in The Wet Darkroom: Film, Paper & Chemistry
Posted