shaun_carter

<p>excellent guys thanks! i'm leaning towards the 7D MkII for the higher iso's and improved autofocusing.</p>

<p>Thanks Rick. i have the 17-40 4.0 lens as my wide angle. I've been doing some research this morning and it doesn't appear that photoshop or lightroom currently supports 7d MkII raw files. That would be a problem for me. I'm sure i could convert raw to tiff or jpeg using the software that comes with the camera but i'd like to still be able to manipulate white balance in lightroom using the full flexibility of raw files. </p>

<p>Thanks for the replies. I shot weddings part time for about 8 yrs but now mostly shoot just family events, kids sports, travel, and occasional portraits and events. Out of the 3 above, I can say the one I have been most disappointed with (sharpness) is the 24-70 2.8 when shooting indoor sports at 2.8. But my question above is just technically speaking, which has canon made the most improvement on for better image quality. I currently do not own a full frame (sold the 5d) but will probably get the 5d mkII sometime in the near future. Indoor basketball, volleyball, karate, baseball, marching band, I'm looking to gear up more for that now as opposed to weddings. </p>

<p>What's the better upgrade? Which has the most significant improvement over its earlier verision?<br> Canon 7D to 7D MkII<br> Canon 70-200 2.8 IS to 70-200 2.8 IS II<br> Canon 24-70 2.8 to 24-70 2.8 II</p>