james72
-
Posts
7 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by james72
-
-
Sorry... the files are small, for hobbies and such. sold as a pack of 4 or 5. Also, it doesn't take a lot to make the image on the film so don't go crazy and remove half you film holder. :)
-
I use the same tank and it took some time getting the inversion cycles right without any surge marks from emptying too fast or uneven development marks. it just takes some time and good luck. You'll burn through some film figuring it out.
With regards to keeping track of what film, I read somewhere about notching your holders and gave it a try. It requires you to keep notes but here's what I did. First, go to a hardware store and look for a pack of metal files. Mine are round, half-circle, triangle, diamond, and flat. I went and systematically filed into the flap of my filmholders a code. Basically, I did triangle, triangle, triangle, turned the holder over and did, triangle, triangle, circle. Then on the next holder, I did triangle, triangle, flat. So on and so on. You get the idea. Now, you MUST be careful and clean all edges and surfaces of particles. Whatever you can do to make sure you get all the microscopic pieces of filmholder up. Once that's done, all you do is keep track what holder got what exposure in your notebook. For instance, "Circle, Circle, Flat 1/60 @ f/8". Then, once the film is developed, you can see this new edge-marking and compare it to your notes to determine which sheet it is. I went to see Richard Avedon's The West (?) show and noticed he did the same (they were printed to the edge).
-
I suppose I'm just frustrated and grasping for straws. I ordered a box of Delta (lower film speed) to hopefully make it all better but it's on backorder and the weather hasn't cooperated all summer and fall (it's all cloudless skies and high contrast everything) and no one seems to have any Ilford film anywhere (I've shot Kodak for the last 20 years and feel like I'm being forced to move on as Kodak is doing itself). Sorry to be complaining. A nice sharp-grained film would really hit the spot about now. Like I said, I'm just glad my methods seem to be consistant.
-
Thanks for the information. I'm considering changing to Ilford's fine-grain developer (ID 11) if for no other reasons than variety and to find one I really like. I suppose I was somewhat dissapointed when my first prints weren't the sharpness I've seen on other LF prints. As for size I'll be printing I have a somewhat naive outlook I'll be doing 16x20s and 20x24s with sweeping landscapes of grandeur and portraits... forgive me while I get the rose color out of my eyes... In reality I'm printing 8x10s but will probably try 16x20s in the coming weeks. All this talk about film is almost moot because all the film I've ordered is on backorder and has been for 2 weeks...but I digress...I am glad to know I at least came to what Ilford says is their film's speed. Thanks for the information once again.
-
New to 4x5 so I figured I'd start out right by ISO testing my film.
FP4 Plus for 10 minutes at 68 in DD-X 1:4 in Daylight tank with mild
agitation (tilting one side of the tank every second, alternating
sides with each second) every 30 seconds gave me EV 160. I thought
this was odd and re-tested and had the same results. I understand
this is my rating with my methods. That's fine. My concern is, at EV
160, will I be losing sharpness or acutance I would otherwise have
if it was rated at a lower ASA? That is, will my negatives'
sharpness or acutance (grain size, in particular) be the same
as "Bob's" negs with EV 50 or even EV 25? And, if not, what can I do
to decrease grain size? Or should I simply choose a different film?
Any clue what I'm talking about? Thanks in advance.
-
New to 4x5 so I figured I'd start out right by ISO testing my film.
FP4 Plus for 10 minutes at 68 in DD-X 1:4 in Daylight tank with mild
agitation (tilting one side of the tank every second, alternating
sides with each second) every 30 seconds gave me EV 160. I thought
this was odd and re-tested and had the same results. I understand
this is my rating with my methods. That's fine. My concern is, at
EV 160, will I be losing sharpness or acutance I would otherwise
have if it was rated at a lower ASA? That is, will my negatives'
sharpness or acutance (grain size, in particular) be the same
as "Bob's" negs with EV 50 or even EV 25? And, if not, what can I
do to decrease grain size? Or should I simply choose a different
film? Any clue what I'm talking about? Thanks in advance.
Yankee Tank
in Black & White Practice
Posted