Jump to content

robert loop

Members
  • Posts

    400
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by robert loop

  1. I have some contaxes IIa, IIIa and a Kiev 4.

    All are excellent and with the 50 mm1,5 it gives great coulours. For shooting in the street

    it is great, a contax does not take much place in a big pocket. If you want to shoot sports

    not the best choice.

    My choice: for the low price a kiev 4 from soviet camera 90$, a contax with collapsible

    lens would cost around 350 $ but take care havind hood to prevent flare or the one with

    the 50 mm 1,5.<div>00G3EG-29429784.thumb.JPG.4e8020ac9b4977de7a6229ef0b6fcf93.JPG</div>

  2. I see that the brand new zeiss ikon has an M mount for Leica lenses.

    I own beautiful 50 mm and 85 mm lenses for contax II a.

    Could I put them on the ZI ? Does an adapter exist ?

    If so what would be the name for this adapter ?

    I have seen on for contarex lenses on e bay. But contarex doe not have the same mount as a

    contax IIa.

    To summarize: which lenses would the new ZI accept ?

    Thanks for your thoughts...

  3. The question is in the title. It seems that Ikoflex like this one are less expensive than the

    Rollei. Why ? Is the reputation of Rollei (like Leica vs Zeiss) giving a justified advantage to the

    Rollei ?

    What do you think about Ikoflex Ic ? A good camera ? Or just for Ikon fans ?

    The main use would be portrait. Is the Rolleiflex 3,5 with Xenotar lens a lot better ?

  4. Mr Budding, do you think that all the coated contax zeiss 8,5 cm 2.0 would fit on a Contax IIa

    or IIIa.

    My point was that the seller Leicashop in Vienna has 5/ 6 8,5 cm 2.0 zeiss contax lenses for

    contax and on the site he says one out of these is for contax IIa or IIIa.

    So it seems that not all these lenses can go nicely on the contax IIa or IIIa.

    I do not know if I say it correctly as my mothertongue is not english.

    Regards

  5. You know , this camera I just bought on e bay and I am waiting for it to comme from russia...

    Reading your comments it gets even more appetizing ...

     

    When I oooked at the picture on e bay it seemed that the leather skin was flat (pas de grain),

    why is it so ?

    Sorry fo my bad belgian english !!

    PS it is zorky 1 from soviet souvenirs (very cheap) nr 425519

  6. Hello Doug, I fully agree with you. And it is no use to have many cameras ...

    But today I saw in a shop in Bruxelles for 2799 euros the 645 contax kit with 80 mm 2.8 and

    for the same price the Mamiya 6 but with three lenses... I am not planning to buy for the

    moment..but just improve a little bit my knowledge in this new world...

×
×
  • Create New...