Jump to content

ian_scholey

Members
  • Posts

    114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ian_scholey

  1. Using the correct paper profile will allow you to understand the gamut and dynamic range of the paper / ink combination you are using.

     

    The fundamental difference between paper which reflects light and monitors which emit light mean that you will never get an exact match.

     

    With careful use and 'training' yourself it will however be very useful.

     

    I find it particularly useful in checking shadow detail, or the lack of it. Leaving the softproof on and adjusting the curves will allow some compensation for lack of shadow detail and limited dynamic range

     

    Ian

     

    http://profiles.colourperfect.co.uk

  2. The EEM issue is probablt due to the prescence of optical brightning agents (OBA). These chemicals make the paper appear whiter and brighter (also used in washing powders). They do degrade with time and the paper used will return back to its natrual state (looking slightly yellow).

     

    OBA's are used as the cheapest way to make paper whiter.

     

    EEM does used OBA's. So do some papers made by Hahnemuhle !

     

    Manufacturers rarely say how much OBA's are added except when they dont use any.

     

    Ian

     

    http://profiles.colourperfect.co.uk

  3. There is a fundamental difference between emitted light (monitors) and reflected light (prints). You need to try for a match between the bightness of the ambient light reflected off the paper and that comming from the monitor.

     

    If your monitors turned up bright it can produce far more light than you can get reflected off paper.

     

    New monitors are increasingly being made with backlights that can produce 300 to 400 cd/m2 so they can be used as TV's. Its not what you want for photo editing unless you wear sun glasses !

     

    Then you can start thinking about the color of the light (both the monitor which can be adjusted during calibration and the ambient light)

     

    Ian

     

    http://profiles.colourperfect.co.uk

  4. There is absolutely no need to convert to a paper profile. If you do this then the file is permanently linked to that printer/paper combination, not realy what you want.

     

    Soft proof and then print from the original source space using the appropriate printer/paper profile.

     

    If you source space is proPhoto then there is a more significant risk of colors that are significantly out of gamut.

     

    Ian

     

    http://profiles.colourperfect.co.uk

  5. Which ever editor you use, if you want accurate color reproduction you need to start by calibrating your monitor. The hardware methods using a puk are by far the best solution.

     

    When you can see the correct colors you can make better judgements about auto-correction features of the s/w.

     

    The advantages of PS and PS Elements is that they support color management fully.

     

    If you have made your adjustments in an editor then you should ask any printer's to turn off any adjustments.

     

    If you are printing your own images then try and use any canned profiles that were installed with the printer for different paper types.

     

    If and when all this is sorted out then you may want to consider custom printer profiles.

     

    Ian

     

    http://profiles.colourperfect.co.uk

  6. Captain,

     

    You dont give many details about your printer / paper / inks, however PrintFix had a reputation for questionable performance. Reports of Print Fix Pro are better although it is seen as a 'value for money' solution that isn't too expensive. Whether it will deliver the results you require depends on a number of factors.

     

    Have you considered custom profiles made for you ?

     

    If you can provide a few more details perhaps we can help you narrow down your choices.

     

    Ian

     

    http://profiles.colourperfect.co.uk

  7. Michael,

     

    The advanced B+W mode in the Epson driver is setup for Epson papers. Many users have reported that it doesn't work very well for non Epson papers.

     

    The other route is to have custom printer profiles generated for the individual papers. As the 2400 printer have been designed with improved linearity cutom profiles do produce more accurate results than previous generations of Epson printers. Also I recommend choosing a pronter profile chart with at least 918 patches, if not more.

     

    This ensures there are plently of neutral or near neutral patches which helps improve B+W printing performance.

     

    Ian

     

    http://profiles.colourperfect.co.uk

×
×
  • Create New...