jackson loi
-
Posts
148 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by jackson loi
-
-
Looks similar to my Nikon L35AF (point and shoot)
-
Advices are basically judgments or opinions based on some factual information and evidence. I use the net to collect the facts and evidence, and form my own judgment; advices from other people (especially those with any supporting facts) carry no weight at all.
-
Just to follow up on my own post:
I shot 2 rolls of expired T400CN @ ISO 400, and had them developed in two different labs using C-41 process. The results are underexposed in an inconsistent way, off by somewhere between -2 to -4 EV. It goes without saying that most of my shots that followed the camera metering are all underexposed beyond remedy.
Some of my shots are overexposed by 2 EV deliberately, and the results are contrasty and grainy. It looks similar to HP5+ being pushed one stop.
-
"Im also quite confused about how a 100mm could be a zoom, AND a macro."
</p>
This is just a label by the lens manufacturer indicating a close focusing ability of the zoom lens. A true macro lens should at least achieve 1:2 half of life-size or 1:1 life-size. To my best knowledge, no zoom lens can do that, and even if they can, image quality would be sub-optimal. If you haven't read Philip Greenspun's macro guide, it's a good reference for what gears to get.
</p>
http://www.photo.net/learn/macro/
</p>
A couple of good value macro lenses for Canon EOS are the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 macro and the Sigma 100m f/2.8 macro HSM.
</p>
"Is buying a macro lens a waste for someone who is just begining?" </p>
Absolutely not. If you Know that you need to take some pictures at a close range, which your 50/1.8 cannot do adequately, how can buying a macro lens be wasteful? The general rule is to find out what you want to do and determine your budget, and buy the appropriate equipment. Whether you are a beginner or not is irrelevant. BTW, you are asking a good, intelligent question.
-
"http://www.shinozuka.org/200110autumnlux1/
http://www.shinozuka.org/200110autumnlux2/
"
Uh oh, I saw the images in the third link... and now I can't stop looking for a used Noct.
-
"Not mine, but you can see very shallow DOF (Warning! You will get Lux lust.): "
Thanks for the fair warning, Vic., but I am already suffering from the Noctilust syndrome.
-
The 'scratch' looks remarkably straight, and it looks like the problem is coming from your film scanner. It could be a data transmission error or an optical flaw that misses that vertical strip of the film. If your scanner has ICE, try enabling/disabling it.
One way to verify is to look at your film from different angles; scratches this deep should be visible on the film. If it is indeed the film, it could be your camera or your photo lab... :/
-
I am appalled that the notion of "Leica knew" is now taken as a fact. Michael Reichmann is not a neutral party, and his assertion should be regarded as just one side of the story. I have not seen any evidence strongly supporting that Leica knew - maybe I missed something, if so, please share it.
-
Mendel,
Luca is asking about the Canon 50/1.4 in Leica screwmount, not the EF-series lens for the EOS.
Luca, I don't know ^^;;;;;
-
"But you have to help Leica through thick and thin! Their sturdily built cameras have been there for you haven't they?"
I like Leica, and will order an M8 once the problem is resolved in normal production. You can never 'help' a company by buying their bad products just because you are a loyal customer. Quite the contrary, bailing out a bad product (protectionist actions) will hurt both you and the company. The only way to help Leica is by continuing to demand better products from them, making them increasingly competitive. Leica is not for the mass market, but you can never underestimate the number of potential Leica customers who are currently using Canon and Nikon.
-
I think the rational choice is to cancel the order. Few reasons:
1) Leica's effort to fix the M8 depends on overall order status. I am positive that they will get it fixed eventually, but a large rate of order cancellation should make Leica work out the best solution that is most benefitial to the customers - the brand is at stake here. If, on the other hand, many orders remain in place, Leica will perceive the problem to be minor, and offer a compromising solution.
2) If you get your M8 and the solution turns out to be hardware (sensor) replacement, you will probably be without the camera for some time anyways.
3) In the unlikely case that the problem will never be fixed (low probability is attached to this risk but not zero), the value of the Leica brand and its products will suffer.
It might turn out that the problem can be fixed painlessly with a firmware update (and the early owners claiming 'told ya'), but they took irrational, unnecessary and avoidable risks. Unless your living absolutely hinges on having the M8, there is nothing to gain in buying one doubtfully.
-
nvm... looked up and found the phone number.
-
Julio, I cannot find Ken Hansen anywhere on the web. In a forum post last year, I read that Ken Hansen runs an eBay store under the name Kenhansen - but even this couldn't be found now...
Does anyone know Ken's contact info?
-
I am using the 50 'lux pre-asph (with built-in hood) for 4 years, and have not experienced significant flare problems. It is no more flare-proned than my 35 'cron pre-asph with square-shaped hood.
-
Great work, Craig. I will spend more time viewing your portfolio after work :p
-
-
-
Good looking pictures by this Magnum photographer.
Maybe it's just me, but it looks like a paid advertisement? It got me excited nonetheless :D
-
Toronto here, very near Kindermann actually ^^
-
Congrats! I'm interested in seeing pictures taken by both the M8 and the 28/2.8A. =D
-
If I want a 35mm P&S (which I don't), I'd rather get a Contax T2 or T3.
-
Most of what I want are lenses.
The only camera body I want is M8.
-
I always try not to blink when I ask "how much"!
-
Travis, the images look pretty good! I would miss the silky advance levers of the film-based M's.
Are you buying one (or two)!?
w/nw Flare
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted