Jump to content

jarek

Members
  • Posts

    291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jarek

  1. I doubt that photographing cities you can live with shallow depth of field that large apertures (like 1.4 for instance) will give you. That tells me that you will not avoid a tripod. Keep your lenses and buy a tripod - that would be my advice - sorry to disappoint.
  2. I had to answer the same question some time ago and I went for 17-40. It is a better lens optically then 17-85 no doubt about it. I don�t use it with monopod since I don�t even have any but I am sure that it will work great in that combination. Personally I don�t mind carrying tripod. It works pretty well handheld in some situations too. By the way - I don�t think you will be able to handhold 17-85 IS @ 1/4 - at best results will be inconsistent. I am saying that since I�ve tried it with my 28-135IS to handhold it @ 1/8 � 1/16 and only about 25% of the images taken at about 28 mm were keepers. So you will not probably get away with just the IS if 1/4 is the goal, and you will need some camera support anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...