Jump to content

tomsheridan

Members
  • Posts

    360
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tomsheridan

  1. <p>What will you be photographing? Although limited to one lens, a Rollei TLR with a Zeiss Planar 2.8 lens is as good as it gets for your $700. TLRs are excellent for sitting portraits, suitably discreet for street and candid photography, and take a good landscape. They support a gamut of accessories, including close-up lenses, filters, and a prism. <em>Bon shooting!</em></p>
  2. <p>What will you be photographing? Although limited to one lens, a Rollei TLR with a Zeiss Planar 2.8 lens is as good as it gets for your $700. TLRs are excellent for sitting portraits, suitably discreet for street and candid photography, and take a good landscape. They support a gamut of accessories, including close-up lenses, filters, and a prism. <em>Bon shooting!</em></p>
  3. <p>Calling all Midwesterners, New Englanders, New Yorkers, and Mid-Adlantic types ...<br>

    There is light at the end of the tunnel ... all that ice and snow will magically melt into Spring.<br>

    Here's proof: McGill students sunning themselves late April last year.</p><div>00Y1Tj-320543584.JPG.e40dc31e04c4568cbbb7f46ff75cfe29.JPG</div>

  4. <p>In practically any city, there are impressive churches with beautiful stained-glass windows. This one come from a Catholic chapel on the University of Toronto campus. A no-brainer photographically, but a beautiful work of church art.</p><div>00WxF5-264065584.JPG.3a9b7939c4d181db75adce228cecead4.JPG</div>
  5. <p>My two Nikkormat FT2's have been my workhorses for over 30 years, until I switched to a D90. The five (24mm/2.8, 35mm/2.8, 50mm/1.8, 85mm/1.8 and 200mm/4) lenses provide more-than-adequate image quality. I'll use this gear as long as film and processing are available at a decent price.</p><div>00WrFB-259687584.jpg.4d17744d7fa878cbc053ba9fede5e60d.jpg</div>
  6. <p>I define chaste as what is appropriate for a given situation. In photography (and less so in painting and sculpture) there is clearly a dichotomy (some would say a range) comprising sexual invitation and portrayal of the body as a pure abstract design statement. The former, in a public medium available to children and adolescents, is rightly to be frowned upon, whereas the body as a beautiful form (with a modest erotic element) is surely to be praised.<br>

    As for this site, there are, alas, too many pictures that are overtly erotic and of minimum aesthetic value, and few accomplished expression of lighting and composition that define the body, male or female, as a design masterpiece.</p>

     

×
×
  • Create New...