jim_vanson
-
Posts
2 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by jim_vanson
-
-
I was recently given a brick of Ilford 3200 (35mm) I've developed the first few rolls of it in D76 and it seems to be very good...better I think then TMax 3200 as the contrast is much easier to handle...where the Ilford really shines is when it is rated at EI 1600...so before I take to much time let me get to my question...does anyone have time/temp/dilution for Ilford 3200 at various EI's in XTOL? I Emailed both Kodak and Ilford but so far they haven't been able to help.
Thanks Jim
Processing Ilford XP2 with T-Max developer
in Black & White Practice
Posted
I posted this late last year...you may find it interesting...Jim
<p>
XP2 Super In XTOL!
asked in the B&W Photo - Film & Processing Q&A Forum
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
One of the people I share my darkroom with mistakenly developed a
roll of the new XP2 Super in XTOL 1:2 for 7.75 minutes at 78 degrees.
The XP2 was shot outside at EI 250 on a moderately bright but
overcast day. So here is the kicker...although my friend had to leave
before we could make a print, the negs looked printable, as a matter
of fact they look very printable! The processing included stopping
the negs for 30 seconds in Kodak Indicator Stop Bath. Then fixing in
Kodak Hardening Fixer mixed for film (I will get the ratio for anyone
who wants it) for 10 minutes. We then washed the negs for 10 minutes.
It was at this point that we opened the Patterson jug and found the
XP2 Super mixed in with 3 rolls of TriX. We washed for 20 minutes
then hung the film to dry but noticed chemical stain forming on the
XP2. We restopped the negs for 2 minutes and refixed for 15 more
minutes, then Hypo Clear for 5 minutes (all at constant agitation).
Then a 30 minute wash. The chemical stains seemed to have disappeared
after the reprocessing. Has anyone ever tried developing XP2 or Super
XP2 in conventional B+W chemistry? Is anyone interested in hearing
how the prints turn out? I shoot about 250 rolls of XP2 a year. I've
just started to use the Super. Does anyone want to comment on the new
XP 2 Super. This is my first time in a "User Group" so please
overlook any Faux Pax on my part. Jim
<p>
-- Jim Vanson (primary_colors@hotmail.com), August 08, 1998
Answers
XP2 Super v. non-Super
I'm interested in how the Super compares to 'old' XP2. I used to use
XP2, but became more interested in conventional films. What is your
first impression of Super?
Dana
<p>
-- Dana H. Myers K6JQ (Dana@Source.Net), August 09, 1998.
<p>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
<p>
About 12 years ago, because I didn't know any better, I regularly
processed XP-1 in D-76. I still have some of the negatives, and have
a print in my living room from one. It is beautiful. Don't know why
it works, and I have no idea about archival properties developing
film this way, but I have some very nice negatives.
<p>
-- Darron Spohn (sspohn@concentric.net), August 12, 1998.
<p>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Contribute an answer to "XP2 Super In XTOL!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
bwworld@hotmail.com