Jump to content

jim_vanson

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jim_vanson

  1. I posted this late last year...you may find it interesting...Jim

     

    <p>

     

    XP2 Super In XTOL!

    asked in the B&W Photo - Film & Processing Q&A Forum

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    ----------

     

    One of the people I share my darkroom with mistakenly developed a

    roll of the new XP2 Super in XTOL 1:2 for 7.75 minutes at 78 degrees.

    The XP2 was shot outside at EI 250 on a moderately bright but

    overcast day. So here is the kicker...although my friend had to leave

    before we could make a print, the negs looked printable, as a matter

    of fact they look very printable! The processing included stopping

    the negs for 30 seconds in Kodak Indicator Stop Bath. Then fixing in

    Kodak Hardening Fixer mixed for film (I will get the ratio for anyone

    who wants it) for 10 minutes. We then washed the negs for 10 minutes.

    It was at this point that we opened the Patterson jug and found the

    XP2 Super mixed in with 3 rolls of TriX. We washed for 20 minutes

    then hung the film to dry but noticed chemical stain forming on the

    XP2. We restopped the negs for 2 minutes and refixed for 15 more

    minutes, then Hypo Clear for 5 minutes (all at constant agitation).

    Then a 30 minute wash. The chemical stains seemed to have disappeared

    after the reprocessing. Has anyone ever tried developing XP2 or Super

    XP2 in conventional B+W chemistry? Is anyone interested in hearing

    how the prints turn out? I shoot about 250 rolls of XP2 a year. I've

    just started to use the Super. Does anyone want to comment on the new

    XP 2 Super. This is my first time in a "User Group" so please

    overlook any Faux Pax on my part. Jim

     

    <p>

     

    -- Jim Vanson (primary_colors@hotmail.com), August 08, 1998

    Answers

    XP2 Super v. non-Super

    I'm interested in how the Super compares to 'old' XP2. I used to use

    XP2, but became more interested in conventional films. What is your

    first impression of Super?

    Dana

     

    <p>

     

    -- Dana H. Myers K6JQ (Dana@Source.Net), August 09, 1998.

     

    <p>

     

     

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    ----------

     

    <p>

     

    About 12 years ago, because I didn't know any better, I regularly

    processed XP-1 in D-76. I still have some of the negatives, and have

    a print in my living room from one. It is beautiful. Don't know why

    it works, and I have no idea about archival properties developing

    film this way, but I have some very nice negatives.

     

    <p>

     

    -- Darron Spohn (sspohn@concentric.net), August 12, 1998.

     

    <p>

     

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    ----------

    Contribute an answer to "XP2 Super In XTOL!"

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    ----------

     

    bwworld@hotmail.com

  2. I was recently given a brick of Ilford 3200 (35mm) I've developed the first few rolls of it in D76 and it seems to be very good...better I think then TMax 3200 as the contrast is much easier to handle...where the Ilford really shines is when it is rated at EI 1600...so before I take to much time let me get to my question...does anyone have time/temp/dilution for Ilford 3200 at various EI's in XTOL? I Emailed both Kodak and Ilford but so far they haven't been able to help.

    Thanks Jim

×
×
  • Create New...