jan_jarczyk

<p>Thx Mark but that link doesn't answered my question or does it?</p>

<p>Hi friend of mine ask me (someone who've got a few cameras) to recommend to him a camera in a price range $600-$800 with a lens, I assume he will use it for general purposes <br /> well i have never bought anything in that price range and have no idea what to recommend so i'm asking you.<br /> links to shops in USA are welcome<br /> Thanks <br /> Jan Jarczyk</p>

21 Mpixels :-) and video :-) so many ppl gonna be disapointed ;-)

what about those two blue lines around Caonon logo?<div></div>

I'm not sure weather this is a leak or mistake official canon UK website advertise 180 3.5L IS Macro USM

Image stabilizer in macro lens? lol

<p><a

href=http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/EF_Lenses/index.asp> <h1>LOOK -->HERE<--

</h1></a>

<p>

look at the slide show at the top of the page just after 70-200 IS - picture of a butterfly

i didnt find an article about it so ... hmm....

 

happy shoting

Jan

the red LED on th front is on (and everything looks fine except that it does not fire)

5D isnt bad really! i'v got a few pictures taken at iso1600 and 3200 which are very usable - if i were you i woul tend to overexpose rather then underexpose - i know shoter will slow down . f so then use iso 1600 :-)<div></div>

my place was bulgared some time ago,

 

fortunately police got my staff back :-)

 

unfortunately my backup camera (30D) and speedlite 420EX is broken :-(

 

i think they droped it or throwed (30D has broken LCD)

 

420EX looks fine, it starts, charge, and everything seems to look and work normaly BUT IT DOESN'T FIRE

 

i think it might be lightball or something (if i'm right is it posible to change it how much that would cost?)

any other ideas what might be broken?

 

 

thanks a lot

 

Jan

great job - i like it much more- ok now i love it:-)

quite nice - i mean i like it - but 14 and 15 isnt there too much cake involved? 2 pages out of 15?

regards

jan

Andrew - ive got 5d and this lens - and believe me batery grip is something he wants to buy - the lens is very heavy and hold camera using 3 fingers isnt what i like especialy if i have to use dial wheel - its just doesnt feel right without extra grip - i thing 350d make the problem even worse<p>

regards<p>JAn

Giampi - how much have you sharpen the "bug" ? in camera sharpening ?USM? DPP? thats very sharpIgot only one lens able to produce so great resuts it's 100mm macro <p>regards<p>jan

no i didnt use filter and lens hood was on - its look like another 2weeks before i get another one.

it doesnt sound good

thanks guys for your reaply

jan

flare 75-300 at 5.6<div></div>

flare 200L<div></div>

i didnt notice I posted full size files -sorry about that<div></div>

canon macro<div></div>

sharpness 200L f2.8<div></div>

The source of light was about one �frame� above<div></div>

Hi everyone <p>

I've bought 200mm L two days ago

yester day I tried it and I got some strange results - I mean different then I

expected, especially flare problem I cant shoot against sun - I thought the L

series lenses are the most flare resistant but my copy of 200L was beaten by

consumer zoom canon 75-300 <p>

Second thing, Iﾒm not sure how sharp it should be but I heard that is suppouse

to be very sharp but was significantly beaten by either 100mm macro or 50 f1.4

Barrel distortion? <p>

I will post some examples <p>

thanks for your feedback<p>

Jan<div></div>

no one mention that Is in body wouldn't work with full frame sensors cos pictures would be really blury at the edges isnt it?

I think you has already answer your qestion "I'm using it" so i gues you notice that its work as fine above 5.6 as it works At 2.8

<p>

special autofocus sensor DO work with all lenses wich the bigger aperture is 2.8 and its doesnt matter wich aperture u use that what really matter is the biggest avalible aperture of any lens<p>

regards <p>

jan

im using 5d - and i dont want to use tc :-) i want 500mm and autofocus

Yves i know that i would like this lense but i dont like the price its just too expensive -and to be honest i'd like something bit longer then that 400-500mm for birds and and stars -

Jim - not me, im motivated to spent 1000-1500GBP so i gues 2000 is max for me i couldnt justify to bye 3000punds lens just for fun and im sure there is many ppl like me<p>

regards<br>

Jan