James Kazan

Very nice, well seen as they say.

Cheers

Well seen

Maurizio

Where was this taken?

Good timing, nice light

Best Regards

I stopped and had to look twice. I though the name said John Crosley and I knew it was Bryce Canyon. I though the same John Crosley the wonderful street photographer and it was! Not that you can't take some other type of photos. Nice shot John when were you at Bryce and what camera were you using? Back in my film days I always tried to use ISO 100 if I could.

Doug

Nice job in the fact that the building is not falling in on itself like most church shots I see. It seems like most people want to use a wide lens distorting the building and the architects vision or worse yet using HDR to show colors that are not true to the building. I must say I've never been a fan of Church architecture unless it's a structure such as the Air Force Academy Chapel by Walter Netsch.

Best regards

niki

Have you never heard of the famous Cleveland Clinic? They have hospitals outside of Cleveland you know. Perhaps you should look before you leap.

Tony

I hope you don't mind but the water is running down hill to the right side of the frame. This always drives me crazy. Here is a +1.5 tilted version.

http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww274/JKazan/Thumbnails/12991783-lg.jpg

Simple and effective.

Well seen

Makes a nice abstract.

Thanks for the Feedback!

Interesting that it looks over sharpened at 750 pixels. It was downed sized from 28.5" x 38" 3oo dpi master in two steps, first dropped down to 150 dpi with light sharpening and then dropped down to 72 dpi 750p with no sharpening. There are no artifacts in the white thin boarder which would stand out in any over sharpened posting. It must be the materials in the mausoleums themselves. Granite, Marble and Sandstones have specks and grains. Again this presentation is really suited as a large format print 18" x 24" or larger.

I'm looking for feedback. This is a reworked project that I'm

submitting to a show. It is scaled down from an 18" x 24" poster print

format. The original work master is 28.5" x 38". Unfortunately this

really needs to be viewed as a print so I understand the viewers

limitations as I use the internet hopefully for some constructive

feedback.

You gotta love those lines.

A interesting POV but this long thin posting unfortunately just doesn't work for internet postings. It's really hard to view this photo. The foreground looks out of focus but it's hard to tell. You have no technical information? What F stop did you use?. May I suggest this horizontal 4x5 crop.

http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww274/JKazan/Thumbnails/a.jpg

It's the simplicity and the framing of this presentation that makes it work for me.

Lovely

I like the lines of this. I thought a 4x5 crop eliminating some of the bottom black free space would make for a stronger presentation.

I hope you don't mind this type of feedback.

http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww274/JKazan/Thumbnails/1-lg.jpg

Best Regards

In architectural photography building should never be falling over IMO. It is a interesting B&W rendering. Perhaps you should have place this in the fine arts category.

Tasty idea

Amr

This is a eye catcher. Your perspective makes it a wonderful abstract.

Sebastian

I really like your original photo but your post work for me takes away from the original. The phony sky effect IMO weakens the presentation. I'm sure you will find many members who will disagree with me.

Best Regards

I like the blue arrow in the center.

Gerry

I like your idea of perspective but I have to agree with Jeff. The buildings are falling over and inward. He is right that some of this can be corrected with PS but a better choice of lens is where one has to start. 35mm to 50 mm would have been my choice.

Best Regards

Nice job, florescent lighting in the shot is always hard to control. This looks good with your exposure.

Best Regards

Dave

I have a engineering background. That being said I'll except that it's a little bit of both. Photography and computer algorithm using the human factor as artist.

Best regards

I'm curious

This question is not to denigrate you but is this a photograph or a computer algorithm?