Jump to content

maciej_m__281_czy__324_ski

Members
  • Posts

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by maciej_m__281_czy__324_ski

  1. <p>Helo Peter!<br> It everything depends what kind of photography You prefer, if You like street photography, portraits and more artistic point of view I think standard 50mm lens would be good choice for FF. I live in Europe and I was in these three cities and I think 24-105 lens would be more useful for general travel photography. This cities in Europe especialy this old parts were built in Middle Ages and they are very compact and tight and 24mm lens would be more useful in such a places.<br> Both Prague and Budapest (it was 2 cities: Buda&Pest) are cities located on two banks of river and 105mm would be useful for long distance views.<br> In Sweden weather can be tricky (very windy and rainy) and I would take professional lens, 24-105 would be better choice as well. <br> Have a great trip<br> Maciej<br> p.s. Beware of pickpockets in crowded places.</p>
  2. Hi! My oldest CF card by Sandisk is ten years old and I have no problem with it. Only one Emtec CF card was damaged out of the box but changed on warranty. You`d rather forget about your small size CF card than it brake down. If you care about cards and carry them in box you won`t have problem with dust in pinholes and card will work for long time. All the best
  3. <p>Hi! I like this lens it`s great to use. Push/pull design has adventages e.g. you can zoom very quickly and you can zoom and focus in this same time. Yes problem with dust is now officialy confirmed by Canon. But this lens is lighter than 70-200 2.8 and focuses to 1,5 meter. Canon EF 400 5,6 focuses to few meters. 100-400L IS is versatile lens especialy for full frame. The best lens for money I ever got. Grab it when you need super telephoto for good price while you still can. Or spend $$$$ on new one, depends on your wallet.<br> All the best</p>
  4. <p>Hi!<br> I`m still using EOS Elan IIe but a I like EOS 630 much more. It`s strurdy, loud workhorse if your budget has limit, it is still great camera for money. But If you need younger machine EOS 3 is great. And in this case you can use Canon EX flases in both systems: analog and digital. <br> all the best</p>
  5. <p>Hello! <br> I`ve got similar problem with Canon analog and digital EOS too. The problem wasn`t battery but shutter button eletronic switch. The cost of canon part was 3$ and about 25$ for service. I hope it helps.<br> All the best </p>
  6. <p>Hi! I use both systems: PC with Vista Pro and 4GB RAM and Mac Mini OSX with 8GB RAM on similar mashines about 5-6 years old. Mac is more reliable system, during this years I had to reset computer maybe 7or 8 times. Windows system stop working more often about three times more often. When I`m working with files from 7D in Photoshop and Bridge both computer are similiar in speed e.g. developing RAW in Canon DPP or photoshop cs4(WIN) cs5(Mac). Maybe Mac is a little bit faster, but it isn`t big deal or worth to pay difference.<br> What is better in Mac: you can add more RAM for example 8GB or more. (To do it in Windows system you should buy 64 bit version and that is extra cost)<br> What is better in Windows: you can use more programs (and free editions) and equipment like scanners, disc, pc cards and so on. (You won`t do it on Mac Pro in cheap way:) )<br> But I like working on Mac in Canon DPP more:)</p>
×
×
  • Create New...