Jump to content

glenn_cummings1

Members
  • Posts

    352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by glenn_cummings1

  1. glenn_cummings1

    Rhododendron

    Rhododendron beginning to blossom.

    ©

  2. glenn_cummings1

    Christine Falls

    Christine Falls in Mt Rainier NP

    © CUMMINGS

  3. City of Tacoma with Mt Rainier boldly watching over it.

    © CUMMINGS

  4. glenn_cummings1

    The Palouse

    Palouse Hills in Eastern Washington
  5. At close to 600 feet, Multnomah is the tallest waterfall in the state of Oregon.

    ©

  6. Shot at 400mm to compress the image so that Rainier is literally sitting atop the sailboats.
  7. Thanks Leslie.  The tip of the tree being cut off always bothered me as well.  This was shot at 40mm with a 24-105, I believe.  I do have another image shot at 24 but the mountain seems too far in the distance.  
  8. Early morning on the Skagit.
  9. Artist: Cummings; Exposure Date: 2016:01:01 09:49:30; Make: Canon; Model: Canon EOS 5D Mark III; ExposureTime: 1/1000 s; FNumber: f/6; ISOSpeedRatings: 640; ExposureProgram: Shutter priority; ExposureBiasValue: 0/1; MeteringMode: Pattern; Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode; FocalLength: 400 mm; Software: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh);
  10. <p>A sincere thank you to all for the detailed responses.</p> <p>This will all help me to make an informed decision. Weight reduction is one of my main reasons for switching, however I need to be able to make quality prints up to 16x24 and that's the dilemma I face. EVF vs. OVF is also a concern as I have never used anything other than OVF's.</p> <p>I like the look and feel of the Fuji XT1, reminds me of my original Nikon FM. I'm also considering the Olympus EM1 but am very concerned about Micro 4/3's format and the ability to print up to 16x24.</p> <p>Again, thanks for everyone's input. I've got some serious research to do and decisions to make.</p>
  11. <p>Thank you all for the replies. Sony doesn't interest me much due to the overall size of their lenses, which equate to pretty much the same as what I currently have.</p> <p>I rarely print larger than 16x24, so a crop sensor shouldn't be an issue, even with landscapes. In fact, perhaps MFT's could even be an option with Olympus. However, all the research I have already done leads me to the Fuji X system with their stellar lenses.</p> <p>I really want to pull the trigger, I'm just so concerned that I will regret it later with the quality I am accustomed to.</p> <p>Thanks everyone!</p>
  12. <p>As always, I've come to Photo.net for some excellent advice.</p> <p>I'm considering the move to mirrorless from Canon full frame, primarily for the reduction in weight. Currently, I shoot with the 5D3 and four "L" lenses...17-40, 24-105, 100 Macro and 100-400. This setup is ideal for what I normally shoot, landscapes and nature.</p> <p>I'm currently looking at the new Fuji XT-2 body with comparable lenses to what I now have.</p> <p>Am I crazy or does this possible switch seem to make sense to those of you utilizing the mirrorless system? Will I miss the resolution of FF or be completely satisfied with the move. I'm not really interested in the Sony system.</p> <p>Any and all responses are appreciated.</p> <p>Thanks,<br> Glenn</p>
  13. Colchuck Lake; Alpine Wilderness in the Northern Cascade Mountain Range, Washington.
  14. Photographed inside a cave along a coastal wall at Lanai Lookout, Oahu, Hawaii. Nikon N90 with a 60mm macro lens housed in a Nexus housing with Ikelite strobes. Fuji Velvia, f22; 1/60 sec.
×
×
  • Create New...