Jump to content

berkshire-wedding-photogra

Members
  • Posts

    65
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by berkshire-wedding-photogra

    Winter Temple

          26

    It is a stunning shot, but judged alongside some of your other work, it is not 'perfect' as some of the others here have stated. What lets it down IMHO is lack of detail in the sky. I know that is something you have no control over. A lot of my own shots have been ruined by having 'too good' a weather. I would love to have been there during the night before and taken advantage of the clear skies to take a star trail shot!!!

     

    Still I love your photography immensely and I really admire your dedication in getting out there into the real wilderness.

     

    Keep up the good work

     

    Luben - www.solev.net

  1. Zdrasti Mariana,

     

    I love your images. You are one of the first great BG landscape photographers I've had the opportunity to come across. If you know any others, I'd love to hear from you about them.

     

    I am a Bulgarian living in UK, but I hope to start visiting the "homeland" again & try & capture some of its beauty too.

     

    Keep up the great work & keep in touch

     

    Vsichko hubavo

     

    Luben

    Fairy Falls

          10

    You really have captured the essence of these falls. Top Marks for that. Could I ask how you managed to take the shot so close to the falls? The spray must have been very intense so close to the base of these large falls. Thanks again for sharing.

     

    Luben

  2. Hi Phil,

     

    Thanks a lot for the comment on my website. I am pleased you found my tech details & links section useful. I love your galleries too. This shot particularly. the drama in the sky is astonishing & the sand + rocks in the foreground perfectly ballance the scene. Keep up the good work.

     

    Luben

  3. Hi Rob,

     

    Thanks for the critique of my Tower of the Virgin Startrails shot. I love your version. You have angled the camera upwards, which has produced a dramatic perspective. The storm clouds overhead really add to the drama of the scene. Well Done!!!

     

    Luben

    Untitled

          5

    Hi Will,

     

    Thanks a lot for your feedback. I'd never contemplate using the polarizer on the 10-22 with clear sky, since the effect will only be pronounced in parts of the sky. When the sky is overcast (such as with the photo above), I can get away with it. In this shot I used the polarizer to improve the colour of the foreground rock & light-up sand.

     

    And no, I did not use a ND grad as such. What I do is I shoot RAW, then make different exposures in Capture One & then I combine them in PS using a Gradient Mask. If the luminance difference between the foreground & the sky is big, I'll actually bracket & use the underexposed version for the sky. This method takes more storage space & more post processing time, but yields better results & saves me from having to buy into a filter system.

     

    All the best

     

    Luben

    Untitled

          5

    Location:

    St. Michael's Mount, Cornwall, UK

     

    Year:

    2006

     

    Tech Specs:

    - Camera: Canon EOS-20D DSLR

    - Lens: EF-S 10-22 f3.5-4.5 USM

    - Aperture: f16

    - Shutter: 2 secs

    - ISO: 100

    - Filters: Hoya S-HMC PRO1 Circular Polarizer

     

    Work in software:

    I shot this shot in RAW & processed it using Phase Oneメs Capture One

    & Adobeメs Photoshop programs. The processing involved white balance

    adjustment, Dynamic Range blending (to darken the sky), contrast

    enhancement & sharpening.

  4. Me and my friend went to Corfe Castle to capture the Sunrise. We

    thought we would have the place to ourselves. We were wrong. There

    were another 4 pairs of photographers including the distinguished

    photo.net member Adam Burton. All of us got one hell of a view!!!

     

    Enjoy

    lines

          8
    Hi Paulo, I think you have a strong image both due to the colours * shapes involved. I do think it is a tad underexposed, but otherwise it is very good. Luben - www.solev.net
  5. This is a stunning capture indeed & it is well worth the long treck. I do think it is between 1/2 and a full stop underexposed though. At least it looks that way on my monitor. Great shot none-the-less. All the best. Luben - www.solev.net

    04

          8

    I like the foreground, but there appears to be too much of it & the lack of a object which stands out confuses the eye. The cliffs are well exposed, but the sky shows very obvious use of an ND Grad. Some people find this appealing, but I personally think the effect is overdone in this case. Finally, it is a little weird to have a seascape without a good view of the sea itself. You were unfortunate in the fact that you were shooting at low tide. I took this shot from exactly the same place looking the other way (but at high tide) and got a better beach:

     

    http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3175047

     

    Shame I too somewhat messed-up my foreground subject!!!

     

    All the best

     

    Luben - www.solev.net

  6. Jim, The colour of the sky is purely due to the White Balance selected in Phase One. No other colour correction was applied to the image. Also thanks for the advice on framing.

     

    -----

     

    Kamran, you are correct, I used bulb exposure. While the exposure was happening, I was sitting in the relative safety of our hire car :-)

  7. What do you make of it? What would you have done differently? This

    is one of several shots taken at the same place. To see the others

    go to www.solev.net

     

    Thanks in advance for your comments

     

    Luben

  8. Hi All,

     

    I recently took this sunrise image of Donnington Castle in Berkshire

    UK. The image is a composite of 10 individual Canon 20D shots,

    which have been stitched & blended to produce this 20x8 panoramic

    print. You can see the individual parts of the image here:

    http://www.pbase.com/luben/image/39496972

     

    Blending between the darker & lighter shots was done to increase the

    available dynamic range, since I don't use ND grads to darken the

    sky. Photos were taken using the 17-40f4L lens.

     

    What do you think of the framing? And how about the PS work? Is

    this a believable image, or does it look doctored to you. I was

    going for the natural look.

     

    Thanks in advance.

  9. Hi All,

     

    This is my first foray into the world of Photo.net. Standard is so

    high, I had to start with one of my personal favourites - the

    manmade waterfall at Virginia Water, Windsor. Image is taken with a

    converted Sony DSC-F717. Any critiques & ways to improve on the

    image would be much appreciated. I hope to take the same image with

    the autumn colours & post it here soon.

     

    Thanks in advance

     

    Luben - www.solev.net

×
×
  • Create New...