Jump to content

christian hilmersen www.

Members
  • Posts

    370
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by christian hilmersen www.

  1. <p>Robert Hopper, I have developed all my films up till this November. My problem is not the developing, but the drying. The bathroom, where I used to dry film, is no occupied by baby-baths etc... The rest of the house isn't dustfree enough... (And, I must admit, I do enjoy getting a print for all my pictures...so I can spend more time on scanning and adjusting the best pictures.<br>

    Anyway, I think the I'll just keep it - and take some test shots with the M9 this weekend. A selv developed picture: (hexar rf+hexanon 50) - delta 400 I believe<br>

    <img src="http://www.hilmersen.net/cmsimple2_4/images/trapp-montpellier-darker-small%20copy.jpg" alt="" /></p>

  2. <p>Steven: I agree with you...but I haven't tried it on an M9. My thought was that if I have to buy a lens to get good results on the m9, I would start with the lens.<br>

    Mukul: You are right, off course. But different lenses give different looks...<br>

    I will take my lens and a memory card to the store and take some test shots - I guess that will answer my questions. <br>

    Today I delivered a tri-x for the development at the minilab. I shot it at 320asa, but gave no instructions - hope that will give me better results than my previous attempt with minilab development (where all tri-x film were too dark). If it works, the need for going digital(*) will go drastically down. In a few years I will hopefully be able to develop my own films again. (* Have a Oly E3...but I am talking about rangefinders)</p>

  3. <p>For now I scan with a coolscan5, but my darkroom is waiting in my storage for an upgrade of my apartment/house. I mostly print 30x45cm. I do use a lot of tri-x in ultrafin plus, - which I absolutely love for 20x30cm blow ups...but is also nice for 30x45. In summer I tend to use acros 100. TriX and ultrafin plus seems to give a true 400 asa, and the grain is nicely controlled. A good scan from acos 100 is really good. Just got a kid, so I will outsource my development for a while, which might lead to dropping TriX for a while (seems like the true asa for the minilab development is around 300 asa).</p>
  4. <p>I keep hearing what Robert says. Presumably the microcontrast is higher on the leica - but not sure, and is it noticable...and if it is, is it allways a good thing? What I love about the hexar is the overall rendering - way better than the other normal lenses I have tried (canon fd50 1.4, summilux 1.4 25 and hasselblad 80) See my homepage (hilmersen.net) for samples of my shooting style...if that matters. <br>

    I had the hexar rf - but the rangefinder-prism was chipped/crushed/broken. Loved the camera: much less rangefinder-flare than with the m6. Still have it, so if anybody can repair it, I am listening. (I live in europe/norway).<br>

    Personally I don't like the 90, but the 28 and 50 are great. The 28 was sharper than leica at "PHOTODO", but alas I am not at 28mm man... </p>

     

×
×
  • Create New...