Jump to content

eric stolk

Members
  • Posts

    493
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by eric stolk

    Untitled

          6

    what lovely hair....

     

    It's the same when you see a really ugly baby: "what lovely shoes!"

     

    Don't get me wrong: there's absolutely nothing wrong with the lady, just with the photographer who took this 'quick, get your clothes off and squat on that rock' kindofa picture.

     

    Boo

    Almost

          4
    greg i actually love this shot. i sort of bashed you earlier, but i really like this one. your work reminds me of me on speed

    Car Park 1

          13

    great compo, classic.

    maybe it's me, but i can't quite distinguish the black 'shape'.

    that distracts me (i can't be bothered what it is, the shape is good and in the right place, but it irritates me that i can't see what it is..irritating is good though)

    Off Oxford street

          3

    First off all: thank you for commenting my work, i really appreciate it.

    Second: i'm not trying to be a wise-crak here, nor do i try to suggest that i have all the wisdom in my pocket. The things i wrote were sort of critique, but i'm not trying to put you down, certainly not.

     

    It's really really complicated, the subject matter (for me it is!) but i'll try to explain...

     

    For the past 7 or 8 months, i'm trying to photograph 'nothing', and yet, it is NOT nothing. Why is it not nothing? I don't know. Sometimes it's the light, a stain, a beaten track, some circles in water etc. etc.

    It seems nothing, but still i (and hopefully others) 'see' a lot happening. Maybe because i'm sensitive to implications...

     

    Trying not to sound arrogant, but this picture lacks that tension field and i am missing that. Maybe it was not at all your intention, but i'm missing 'something'...So this picture would not meet my criteria (or would not have been taken, by me)

     

    Are you still with me?

     

    The longer i look at it though, the better it gets. The composition is correct.

    Just looked for that little je-ne-sais-quois and didn't find it

     

    Regards,

    Rick

×
×
  • Create New...