Jump to content

cghubbell

Members
  • Posts

    793
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by cghubbell

    Dragonfly

          2

    My first dragonfly... I've been wanting to get this shot since the

    day I brought my macro lens home. Your thoughts and criticisms are

    appreciated!

    Untitled

          3

    A building in Rochester, NY's historic High Falls district. I found

    it a fascinating study in Nature's reclaming the abandoned space. I

    apreciate your thoughts and criticisms.

    White Clematis

          3

    Still working on the specific identification, but in the mean time,

    I'd appreciate critiques of the shot. I was working with an SB-800

    and a relfactor to event out the lighting. Your comments are appreciated.

  1. The two corners are balancing each other, and bounding the abstract interior of the image. There is also a subtle outfanning pattern which is emphasized by them. This is a very subtle composition. Thanks for your feedback!

    Java and Stick

          3

    Another portrait of Java... Took this one with a lens I don't

    normally use for this sort of thing and I'm quite pleased with its

    outcome. As usual, your thoughts and critiques are appreciated.

  2. While I appreciate your taking the time to comment, I'm afraid your assumptions were off base. I was not at all trying for the classical landscape with clearly defined fore, mid and back grounds. In fact, there is almost no discernable midground.

     

    I also disagree with two of your statements. Namely that a landscape needs to have a nuclear sky, and that a landscape needs to be vast. A landscape needs a nuclear sky when the photographer intends to have the sky's drama be the image's subject. A landscape needs to be vast when the photographer intends to convey vastness. I wanted neither.

     

    A landscape is just that. A landscape. In this case, I was focusing on the strongly converging lines made by the different layers of earth, and complimented by the (as found) driftwood and even the parallel wave. The geometry in this scene is quite amazing to me, and that was the photo's intent.

     

    I could put on a filter or tweak curves to create an artificial sky, but that would be a completely different subject. I have plenty of sky shots; this was intended to be more subtle.

     

    I respect that everyone connects with different images, and perhaps you didn't connect with this one. Fair enough. But before providing substantial negative feedback based on generic composition formulas, it may be worth spending some extra time studying the elements and trying to understand what motivated an image. There is a world of interest beyond the classical composition if you seek it out. Not saying this image is perfect by any stretch, but all is not lost when someone ventures outside the common ground.

×
×
  • Create New...