fisheye

Okay. It's time to leave. But you have to understand something. I am not a millionaire. Yes, I have only $127,34 in my bank account and have to live with that until next month. I have to live with a nasty instant noodles again. However, I am okay with that. If I can finish my master course, it will be better than this. But this is not what I want to talk about. You said "$25 isn't that much money".<br>

<br>

No. $25 is absolutely much money to everyone. Let me borrow my friends speaking. "With $25, I can buy a 2 boxes of instant noodles and live with over 1 month". You can think him as bum but he isn't.<br>

<br>

You're right. My post was kind of joking. I don't have any problem with their decision. I can

easily understand their problem because I also was in various internet business and I

pretty well understood your point. Your ranting was quite resonable. I can give you

that.<br>

<br>

First of all, the word "Rights" could be my wrong choice. But..<br>

<br>

"Rights? HA! Since when does a free service entitle the user to RIGHTS?"<br>

<br>

As you can see, I said "we are guest user and don't have any right".<br>

I knew I don't have any rights in ths website. But what's your problem? Did I say something

wrong? I just restated our situation.<br>

<br>

Second of all, I was pretty big website builder and I know the problem of this kind of

business. But don't blame the prospective customer. internet was based on free service

and people loved a free service. Whatever company do, people will do love free stuff

forever! I'm not kidding.<br>

<br>

Finally, my 2 years and over hundred picture isn't mean anything. I pretty like this service

but I am not sure the quality of service. I will immediately pay $25 if I really need this

service. Do you want to know why? Because I'm "dimepincher".

What a suprise, I have a same problem. It looks like they changed site policy. Well, we are

guest user and don't have any right. So, let's delete our picture. 25 more to go. (Click click..)

It could be an answer for your question.

http://www.cameraquest.com/aidaiais.htm#AI'D

I agree with john's opinion. Yes, the accuracy of color is very impotant. If you're serious aobut

the photo retouching with computer application, you have to buy a reliable monitor. Cheap

LCD and CRT monitor does not provides accurate color matching.

I mean "total rating point"<br>

<br>

Sorry for my bad english.

When I request critique on one of my photos, I chose "Critique only"

submission. It looks good. It doesn't show any rating but if I

check one folder with detail, I can see a rating. And It added to

my totall rating point.

It is a bug!

You can check this bug.

http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=403446

Chromatic aberration? Oh I see.<br>

It sound likes a big problem to me.<br>

<br>

I think I have to choose non lens built-in adapter for image quality.<br>

<br>

Thank you Chris. =)

Vivek. Thank you for reply.<br>

<br>

Yes. I knew Flektogon(Carl zeiss) lens is great lens.<br>

But with Nikon SLR, it has one specific problem.<br>

<br>

In Nikon SLR adapter, we have two choice.<br>

With built-in lens adapter and without it. Without built-in lens it doesn't support infinity focusing but it'll not affect any optical quality.<br> But built-in lens adapter will support infinity focusing and decrease Flektogon's lens quality.<br>

<br>

My question is.<br>

<br>

1. If built-in lens would affect Flektogon's lens quality,

how does it affect picture quality?<br> (It will affect color?

contrast or sharpness? I need a small advice.)<br>

<br>

2. And which adapter is would be good choice?<br>

(If you had a choice, which adapter would be your choice?)

Does anyone has experience with Flektogon lens?<br>

<br>

A few days ago, I bought a M42 mount Flektogon 35mm f/2.4 from

ebay.<br> But I'm not sure about the optical quality of lens.<br>

<br>

I have a M42 adapter for Nikon F mount (with built-in lens which will

allow lenses to focus normally to infinity)<br>

And I heard that the built-in lens will decrease Flektogon's lens

quality. Is it true?<br>

<br>

I need guru's opinion. Thank you. =)<br>

<br>

Best regards<br>

Sang Kyu, Han<br>

I agree with Wayne's idea.<br>

<br>

Access<br>

Gear<br>

Legal issue<br>

Event (Location, date, ticket price, local or global etc)<br>

---------------------------------------------------------<br>

Indoor<br>

Outdoor<br>

<br>

It seems to enough for me.

What a great idea!<br>

<br>

I like your opinion. We can share a valuable information.<br>

Sports photograhpy is interesting genre for me.<br>

<br>

You've got my vote!

New metering system for my lens? Hmm That's sounds good to me.<br>

But I don't want to spend more money for that. (I bought it on ebay<br> for $70! It's really cheap!) 80$ for new metering system. Nah...<br>

<br>

I can use old world style metering system.(Using my brain)<br>

<br>

Thank you anyway!!

Thank you for all!!<br>

<br>

It's really helpful to me.<br>

As you can see, I already sent an email to John White and waiting response. <br>

<br>

And my Nikkor 200mm f/4 doesn't fit to my D100. I tried it. I alreday read a lot of articles from other websites (Warning, Don't mount! etc).<br>So I'll not try any more. I don't want to hurt my precious D100.

<br>

Thank you for all PN member!

Oops. Hey David.<br>

My respond was not for you. That was for Richard. =)<br>

Don't get me wrong. =( <br>

And Thank you again.

Thank you David.<br>

It's really good information to me.<br>

And I already sent a email to John White. But no reply.<br>

Maybe I have to make a call or wait more time.<br>

<br>

Thanks a lot. =)

I have a Nikon FM, D100 and several old Nikkor lens.

I'm really satisfied with old MF lens. It's beautiful. But my problem

is Non-Ai old Nikkor lens. Especially Nikkor MF 200mm f/4, It's surely

useless with my D100.

This is my question.

If I converted(convert to AI) my lens, could I use with D100??

Anyone know reliable service or self-kit?

I don't need an expensive option. Like a metering system.

Thank you for reading.

=)

In these days, I realized my uploaded images quality were a little bit

different.<br>

(Yeah, I know my photography skill is not enough. Don't hates me)<br>

<br>

So,I uploaded same image to two different websites.<br>

(photo.net and another)<br>

<br>

I compared to two websites image quality.(same image)<br>

Well, the result was that photo.net pictures quality was slightly

different.<p> I don't know the specific reason.<br>

Image was resized with Photoshop and compressed with JPEG 100%.

(Save for the web)<br>

But if I uploaded to this website, Image quality was droped like JPEG

70%. It's really wierd.<p>

Is it difference of compressing method or parsing(?) method??<br>

<br>

Anyone has any good information about that?<p>

Thanks.<p>

- Q<p>