martin_doudoroff1
-
Posts
72 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by martin_doudoroff1
-
-
If you're really serious about using one of these two lenses for weddings and portraits, then
you want the 24-70, because you want the speed and, to some extent, the shallow depth of
field. Either lens is fine for landscape. Obviously, the f4 has an edge in terms of telephoto
reach.
-
<a href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/24-vs-24.shtml">This
comparison</a> might be of interest to you.
-
There are people who are more interested in the craft and technology of photographic
equipment than in taking pictures. Sometimes it gets a little juvenile, but there's really
nothing wrong with it. It's a mistake to assume that this forum only serves working
photographers.
-
<p><a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-28-300mm-
f-3.5-5.6-L-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx">This review</a> pretty much sums it up.</p>
-
Why would you want ot replace a Digital Rebel with a Digital Rebel XT? Is there something
your Rebel isn't doing for you? What does the XT offer you that's so special? You got tiny
hands?
-
I use my 12x9 Inuos 2 as my primary mouse (using their two button + scroll wheel mouse,
which has since been replaced with a similar 5-button mouse): the mouse has no "cord",
no batteries, is light and comfortable, and utterly and absolutely accurate. When building
masks and doing airbrushing in Photoshop, I set the mouse aside, grab the pen from its
stand, and paint away. It just works.
One of the capital advantages to having the pen as an option is that precise work is far
easier to do than with any mouse, and it's far less stressful on both your hand and your
mind.
-
<p>I cannot vouch for <a href="https://secure.soligor.com/index.php?
id=5&backPID=102&L=1&tt_products=499&L=1">this widget</a> (Soligor AF & MF Slide
Duplicator) at all, but it looks like the right idea. Not cheap, though.</p>
-
Non-destructive editing in Aperture is not like adjustment layers; rather it is a
combination versioning and real-time effects.
Aperture is not a substitute for Photoshop. It is, however, a would-be all-in-one substitute
for a whole constellation of products including Extensis Portfolio, iView MediaPro, Photo
Mechanic, etc. It is a basically a professional version of Apple's consumer iPhoto product.
It is unlikely Aperture will ever run on Windows: it is built around graphics technology
inherent to Mac OS X. Like all of Apple's software, it is intended to increase the sales of
Macintosh computers. I predict this software will, indeed, sell a lot of PowerMacs.
-
CS won't and probably never will. Adobe will release a freely-downloadable update to CS2
shortly that will support the 5D. Until then, you suffer.
-
I doubt you'll be disappointed with any of those cameras, provided it's in perfect working
condition. The D60 has the advantage of better build. The 350D is a scaled down body. It's
unusually small. Some people don't like that. (Me.) I've got a 300D. It's still a great camera.
-
I haven't found definitive information, yet, but I would be surprised if Canon's RAW
processing software will work on Windows 98. It might require Windows 2000 or later.
-
Here's a preliminary report posted here a few days back:
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00Dlwh
I recommend you consider an EF70-200 f4L or an EF70-200 f2.8L, instead. If you really want
the extra reach, then maybe the 1.4X converter?
-
No. IS is a technology that compensates for unsteady hand movement. You can use IS in
conjunction with a monopod, but its primary purpose use is in hand-held photography.
If you are a dedicated tripod/monopod user, you may simply not need IS.
-
I want a CCD in the prism with electronics to project a real-time histogram in the viewfinder
at the touch of a button.
-
I can't speak for the efficacy of IS on the 24-105L, but I use it on the 70-200 2.8 IS and
seldom turn it off. It does take a moment for the IS to kick in, but I've seldom found this to
be a problem. When I'm trying to capture a subject candidly, I usually have the camera
pointed at the subject with the release half-pressed, anyway, so IS is already on when I
actually snap the shot. I suppose you do have to "get accustomed" to IS, although for me
that was pretty fast.
I cannot imagine I would ever pass up the opportunity for IS on a long lens (but I'm not
sure I consider 104mm "long").
Would I trade in a categorically awesome 24-70L for a somewhat dubious 24-105L just to
get IS? Probably not, but I guess you're not getting the results you want from it.
-
I won't question your motivations.
1. Canon's 100mm f/2.8 Macro is considered excellent. They have a pricey 180mm f/3.5 if
you need additional working distance. They also have some other specialized macro tools
available.
2. Canon's weakest suit seems to be wide angle primes. Lots of folks 'round here seem to
be buying Zeiss and Leica glass for their EOS cameras. However, both the Canon EF 50mm
f/1.4 and 50mm f/1.8 are superb, as is the EF 85mm f/1.8 and the EF 135mm f/2L. Also,
given your architectural interests, don't overlook Canon's three tilt-shift lenses, which all
seem quite highly regarded.
3. Canon's 70-200mm f/2.8 zoom is an awesome lens (available both with or without
image stabilization). The image stabilization is one of the major technological advantages
Canon has over the other makers: it really works spectacularly well. Beyond 200mm, you
might be best off with primes, and Canon makes amazing telephoto primes. However, if
you're willing to live with some compromizes, Canon has a 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L zoom
and a 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L.
4. I don't have the necessary background to answer this question.
-
-
For the 5D, 2GB CF cards are more appropriate than 1GB. Wait until Rob Galbraith gets test
results up on his site database: then he'll be able to show you the best (i.e. fastest) cards
specifically for the 5D. Also, buy a Lexar Professional Compact Flash reader (http://
lexar.com/dp/workflow/stack_reader.html). You will want at least one extra battery.
-
I buy from B&H regularly, but I'm more inclined to go to Adorama, which is less of a zoo and
generally a more pleasant customer experience. Despite being physically much smaller than
B&H, they seem to be good about maintaining stock, too.
-
The old "shoe on the other foot" test is almost always worth considering. It is conceivable
that Nikon's engineers, to some extent, willingly prioritized the compromizes Darrell
Young discusses in his article in settling on their DX format. It's also conceivable that
circumstances dictated DX to Nikon. If they had access to a competitive FF sensor, do you
honestly believe they would refrain from offering a product based on it?
It's pretty clear that, in the real world, vignetting on 1Ds and 1DsMkII is tied to the design
of the particular lens, not some unique, inherent, intractible characteristic of sensors. In
this practical respect, the matter is little different from the realities of 35mm film
photography.
Young's discussion of "resolving power" seems facile. I'm no expert, but there are various
discussions around the Internet about the general trade-off between the spacial resolution
of sensor points and sensor dynamic range performance, and the various related trade-
offs in microlens design and fabrication realities.
My suspicion is that Young's article isn't far removed from the "marketing propaganda" he
decries.
Meanwhile, none of this has changed: both Nikon and Canon make excellent DSLRs, and
Canon's FF DSLRs are no exception. The proof is in the pudding.
-
The overwhelming answers on this thread are NO. Clearly the 5D is not viewed by many as
lying on the same path as the 20D. Perhaps the 1DMkIIN would be a more appropriate
candidate? I probably will be buying a 5D, but I'm coming from a 300D, I'm mainly interested
in landscape and portrait photography, I'm frustrated with trying to focus the 300D, and I
want to deal neither with the cost nor bulk of a 1DsMkII.
-
I second that you shouldn't buy all your lenses at once. I strongly encourage you to look
carefully at the 70-200L IS as a primary telephoto zoom. Note that if you buy a 5D, it's
possible that without the 1.6 crop factor, 200mm *won't* be long enough for you.
-
From my point of view, the 1DMk2N and the 5D have nothing much to do with each other.
The 1DMk2N is a professional camera that priorities professional build and continuous
drive speed and stamina. It is a specific design compromise attractive to photographers
who mainly need to capture fleeting moments, such as sports photographers.
The 5D is a semi-professional camera and has far more in common with the 1DsMk2 than
the 1DMk2N. It has high resolution (though not quite as high as the 1DsMk2) and very
limited continuous drive performance (even less than the 1DsMk2). The 5D is (reportedly)
nicely built, but not at the same level as the 1D cameras (mainly a sealing issue). The 5D
could be described as a baby, stripped down 1DsMk2.
If you shoot sports, or something comparable, you should be looking at the 1DMk2N.
Otherwise, you should be comparing the relative merits of the 1DsMk2 and the 5D.
-
<p>Dammit.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-Extender-EF-1.4x-II-
Tele-Converter-Review.aspx">This is the link that is broken in the above message.</a></
p>
Competition for the 5D/ 20D ?
in Canon EOS Mount
Posted
The D200 looks like a very nice camera, indeed. For people who are not committed to the
Canon system, it may attract them over the 20D and 5D, depending on their priorities. Of
course, Canon will probably replace the 20D in a few months...
Nikon certainly isn't in any danger of going away. The makers I'm worried about are Olympus,
Pentax and Konica/Minolta. Canon and Nikon have gotten terribly monolithic in the dslr
market, and I'd rather see more than two competitors.