michael_purcell
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by michael_purcell
-
-
-
-
<p>Because the combo of Tri-X and D-76 allowed the beginner a great deal of latitude in processing and still gave them a workable negative, that was my recommendation for a lot of years. But, like Frank, my first roll, many, many years ago, was Verichrome Pan in Polydol. That was damn near impossible to screw up.</p>
-
<p>Having trouble linking, let's try this.<br>
<img src="http://www.flickr.com/photos/44239341@N00/4766237359/" alt="" /></p>
-
<p>At a Fourth of July party, waiting for the fireworks.<br /> <br /><br>
<img src="http://www.flickr.com/photos/44239341@N00/4766237359/" alt="" /><br>
K20d, 3.5/35 Super Takumar</p>
-
<p>My Canon VT works just fine, but I don't use it that much. Never was an RF guy.</p>
-
<p>If you think that you may want to move to digital MF in the future, consider the Pentax 645 system. I picked up an original 645 and 45, 75 and 150 A-lenses and an AF 400 FTZ flash for under $600. Later i found a 645n body on craigslist for $200. Easy cameras to use as the controls are the same as contemporary 35's. I haven't found that the loss of interchangable backs a disadvantage, especially since extra bodies and inserts are generally less than the backs of other makes.</p>
-
-
POTW May 9
in Pentax
MF POW 10/04/2011
in Medium Format
Posted