borgis_karl_johan
-
Posts
74 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by borgis_karl_johan
-
-
I checked my original slide again with a loupe and do feel the TC20E +VR zoom combo has been prematurely brushed aside as "a poor 400 mm ". This claim done after a test only taking maximum aperture and corner performance of one particular combo into account. My slide - taken closed down one step with VR - clearly shows every minute hair around the owls beak and the in-focus breast feathers. This is easily visible in the jpeg image - submitted in my previous reply above- as well. So the combo isnt such a poor beggar for certain - at least in the more central area of the image. Dont forget that youre free to close down a step or two - thanks to VR technique - in many cases.
Maybe Im lucky and my combination works better than yours due to sample variation. The judgement "a rather poor 400mm combo" is harsh and fortunately not accurate in my experience. If you happen to own the TC and lens, I suggest you rather try for yourself.
This is not to claim that the 300mm +TC 14E may not be better.
-
-
F4 i silent mode (Cs)!
-
Nikon 35 Ti
in Nikon
well I know this is the wrong forum but as a small flexible ultracompact film camera with a great 28mm lens the Minolta TC1 is hard to beat. I got lucky a year ago to find a demo in great condition and never looked back... :-)
Karl Johan
-
...and watch it so the front unit doesn?t fall out...:-)
Karl Johan
-
Some hopefully pertinent points: I used to own a sample of the 20mm f3,5(52mm) lens. Sharpness was just so-so or worse at all apertures at the edges and corners. I sold it.
Two samples of the 2,8 MF lens have both been very sharp and contrasty once closed down to f8-f11. Sensitive to flare though if directed towards the sun.
In both these lenses the front lens group (the CRC one, I think) would tend to get unscrewed (short of falling out altogether) now and again! So vou may want to watch out for this.
Some 10 years back, I bought the 20mm f4 lens which is now my standard 20mm lens when travelling light. Somewhat sensitive to flare and dim to focus. Critically sharp from f5,6 down. Light and compact. My personal favorite.
It?s your choice.
Karl Johan
PS. anybody else experience the "fallout" problem with the 2,8?
-
The F4 with accessory microprism screen works well. Heavy but plenty sturdy. I liked it a lot but mainly use the F100 with AF lenses nowadays.
Karl Johan
-
PS:
Combining a TC14 with my 80-200 mm f2,8 two-ring zoom yields sharp and contrasty images, so that is a zoom/converter combo that works well.
Karl Johan
-
Hello David,
the 400 mm lens was the later IF version. There was no appreciable amount of vignetting using the TC14A , surprise...
Cordially
Karl Johan
-
The TC 14 A is kind of a weird converter, at least mine is:
results with my 85mm AF f1,4 were markedly soft even when the primary lens was well closed down, whereas combined with a manual 180mm ED lens as well as with an old 400mm(!) f5,6 ED lens results were critically sharp. I noted no vignetting at the time.
Just a thought, but beats me..
Karl Johan
-
If you can find one for a reasonable amount of money or don´t care about costs, the 105mm 2,0 DC lens is great. I´ve just recently discovered it and now prefer it to my 1,4 85mm AF lens except for dusk shots. It´s sharp and isolates the subject real well. And sometimes the abberations with DC do work.
-
Photo Colonnaden is very good, they also have heaps of used stuff. www.photohaus.de
Karl Johan
-
I agree with Barry, the Nikon AF lens is truly good, highly flare-resistant and and uniformly sharp. And it´s a great compact travel lens, more versatile than you´d expect.
My 5 cents
Karl Johan
-
I have used the 2,5; 1,8 ; and also 2,0 DC lens fairly extensively for a number of years. This is my experience:
The 1,8 lens: soft wide open and at 2,0, probably due to internal flare, excellent at 2,8 and smaller apertures.
The 2,5 lens (I´ve had two): good from the largest aperture and improving smoothly dowm to f11 (!). It´s a great and compact lens. I felt it always ran slightly behind the 1,8 lens when compared aperture
for aperture.
The 2,0 DC: best of the lot, very sharp even wide open and probably optimal at 4,0- 5,6 already with hardly any loss at smaller apertures except very small ones. Large and heavy which is a significant disadvantage for travel photography. And very expensive (mine was used). I have used the DC feature very sparingly.
Hope this helps
Karl Johan
-
If you look up the term bokeh on altavista, you will find a number of
sites relevant to the topic. I seem to remember the articles in
Phototechnique dealt with the term in principle. At the time of my
lens comparisons, I only did tests for resolution only on
photographic film.
<p>
Hope this helps.
<p>
Karl Johan
-
Quite some years ago I did some comparison series with the Planar and
f2.0 and f1,8 Nikkor standard lenses on slow B&W film shooting the
proverbial brick wall for resolution. I then checked the negs with a
loupe. Wide open and closed down one stop, the Nikon lenses won hands
down... to get comparable sharpness with the Planar required stopping
down to f4,0- f5,6. Now, this does evidently not cover other optical
properties like bokeh and color rendition (which I remember as
slightly warm). Still, it is a nice lens and the Contarex worked like
a charm though 35 years old.
<p>
Karl Johan
-
Mark: please inform us of your results as soon as you obtain your
images. I tried out the lens in a local store and it seems pretty
compact for the range offered. Autofocus- on a F100- was slow
however. Does image quality hold up?
<p>
Karl Johan
-
...anybody heard any rumours why the above-mentioned lens doesn4t seem to reach the market? I believe it was announced for late spring! Technical problems or some marketing scheme?
<p>
Karl Johan
-
Nikon did have a P&S a number of years ago using VR. I know nothing
of it4s technical quality, though. Called the VR700 if memory serves
me right.
<p>
Karl Johan
-
....yes, that is the lens I saw. Apparently the seller has no idea
either. Would be fun to know, though. I tried to contact the lone
bidder, but that was not possible on ebay.de
<p>
Karl Johan
-
I believe I know of a fair number of Nikon lenses in and out of production. Still, the above-mentioned lens right now being auctioned on the German branch of ebay is quite unknown to me. Out of plain curiosity, anybody encountered this lens before?
<p>
Greetings Karl Johan
-
The big lens in front of the "D2" camera may well have been the 17-35
mm zoom- that4s a quite a huge lens. Any hands- on experience with
that lens out there yet? I realize this is a little off-topic
regarding the original question.
By the way, I4d like to see a 300mm f4 lens with IS technology- the
C. lens is just great.
<p>
Karl J.
-
An addition of IS technology to the Nikon lens range evidently would be most welcome. Now, they had a P&S camera employing this technology some years ago but that4s it up to now. Is this because of patent infringements or is the reason all conjecture?
The Boss's Nikon
in Nikon
Posted