Jump to content

danmerkdotcom

Members
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by danmerkdotcom

    London Tourists

          161

    Thanks for bringing me up to date on technology. Since I have never used a computer, I would not know how to manipulate photos the way you people do in the new millennium. I appreciate your honesty.

     

    All along I have been doing things the old fashioned way; using on lens filters, knowing how to use my depth of field when taking an image, and using a light meter when taking pictures with film. I better get into digital, looks amazing that you can create sloppy craft with a click of a mouse. Cool! :)

    Nude 2 -2004-

          15
    Looks like there was some 'slop' when blurring the background of this image. Was this intentional? You probably could have done this in the camera insted. Just a thought. Great lighting.

    London Tourists

          161
    Wait. Are you poeple sure that this is real? This is such a manipulated image that I am laughing out so loud that you are all tricked. There is no way possible that the forground has a 3 foot focus range then falls off the map at 3.2 ft? The guy in the background is in focus, and the car that is 10 more feet from him is so blurry that this makes no sense. I'd bne willing to bet my life that this was manipulated, or at least 2 negatives!

    Glamour Chess

          49

    Must be me but this is a poor use of a tool. This is obvious that this was 'manipulated'. The placement of the board is too forced, and they typography is not sensitive. I would probably believe this more if the board was actually in some 'space' but this looks like a piece of beat up seamless.

     

    Again, just me...

×
×
  • Create New...