k2

How would i know that is stuck. I removed the cartridge and the one next to it , all looks good to me.</br>

:(</br>

thanks for tips</br>

K</br>

I got a message that my black cartage is empty, which i replaced promptly to see

that that the red light is on. the software keeps telling me that the newly

replaced cartage is empty, so opened a new box and put another cartage to see

the problem not going away ?

Krzysztof

what for ?

by asking you might miss the moment.

k

thanks vs

k

another bob

<br>

i was born in poland and had a chance to see with my own eyes the leftovers of the german love from WWII.

<br>

k

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/49794072@N00/136750504/" title="Photo

Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/47/136750504_8118ca6234.jpg" width="500"

height="333" alt="4396" /></a>

Micheal S <br>

"let there be light .... "<br>

enjoy <br>

:) <br>

k <br>

Peter

i just hoped a seed of light would be planted in here ...... but you are right i am wasting

time ....

:)

k

i dont agree, shooting RAW in auto WB mode gives the best palette to start with your CC work . WB burns a specific color lattice space into the image. you can achieve the same result by post-processing "neutral" RAW data , thus by shooting in auto WB mode you have max possibilies to work with. instead of starting Color Correction with already colour warped image via used custom WB, which means you might have not enough data -color depth- in one of the colour channels for futher CC modifications.

k

it depends how you want deal with film grain. one methond is to simply scan exposed flat

( grey and black ) film just for grain reference and then match the grain size in correlation to

your digital image within. you dont want to have digi grain to be too small or too large in

compare with the same size grain in film print. the BW grain match is straight foward

process, the hardball game is with colour, grain patterns and densities are different from

channel to channel.

k

add me too

k

just 2c

it does not matter what you use to build your website, what bothers me the most is bad design .... photography is number one, and if all those addons with fancy animated buttons and menus serve any purpose to enhance the joy of viewing then that is fine, however for most part plenty of web chaos .....

k

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/49794072@N00/29614933/" title="Photo

Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/23/29614933_7d3681ad54.jpg" width="500"

height="333" alt="013" /></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/49794072@N00/55108227/" title="Photo

Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/27/55108227_57573a7ed4_o.jpg" width="418"

height="640" alt="056" /></a>

the spot is not far from you Brad

<br>

<br>

sweet dreams to all....

<br>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/49794072@N00/49263524/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/30/49263524_573c4d7c54_o.jpg" width="750" height="500" alt="012" /></a>

lol

<br>

you found it.....