OT: Widelux v. Horizon: Reliabil;ity & Serviceability in Leica and Rangefinders Posted February 29, 2004 I invented my own Fuji 617 camera, at low cost. It's really a Kodak #1 5x7 view camera, using Fujinon 90mm, 150mm and 210mm view camera lenses (nearly identical to optics Fujinon puts in a helical mount). Fujinon optics can be had at Badger Graphics online store--they import view camera lenses. I bought my lenses on eBay and checked the shutters for accuracy. Also got the old Kodak on eBay, but had Turner Bellows in NY make a replacement bellows. The 7" dimension, is 17.8 cm, and height would be 12.7 cm. It's a simple matter to mask the negative or the print with an aspect ratio of 1:2.8 (6x17) and viola! Panoramic prints. Since most panoramic cameras are going to require a level tripod for shooting anyway, what's wrong with using a view camera? We get the added benefit of perspective control, and each sheet of 5x7 film can be processed alone. I can also focus within the macro world--who said Panoramas must be vast? I print panoramas using an Omega Chromega E and 180mm Schneider Componon. I won't go into it here, but 4x5 format is certainly suitable for panoramas (6x12cm graflock backs are widely available), and so is 8x10 format. Even if you don't have a darkroom, large format prints can be scanned--and are suitable for large murals. Last suggestion... for quality approaching a scanned 2+1/4 negative, I would not rule-out a Canon 8MP Powershot camera. The new top-of-the-line Powershot has "L" glass, makes a huge digital image, and has specific provisions for shooting panoramas. I'm going to stick with My Kodak #1.<div></div>
OT: Widelux v. Horizon: Reliabil;ity & Serviceability
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted
I invented my own Fuji 617 camera, at
low cost. It's really a Kodak #1 5x7 view
camera, using Fujinon 90mm, 150mm and 210mm
view camera lenses (nearly identical to optics
Fujinon puts in a helical mount). Fujinon
optics can be had at Badger Graphics online
store--they import view camera lenses.
I bought my lenses on eBay and checked the
shutters for accuracy. Also got the old Kodak
on eBay, but had Turner Bellows in NY make a
replacement bellows.
The 7" dimension, is 17.8 cm, and height would
be 12.7 cm. It's a simple matter to mask the
negative or the print with an aspect ratio of
1:2.8 (6x17) and viola! Panoramic prints.
Since most panoramic cameras are going to require
a level tripod for shooting anyway, what's wrong
with using a view camera? We get the added benefit
of perspective control, and each sheet of 5x7 film
can be processed alone. I can also focus within the
macro world--who said Panoramas must be vast?
I print panoramas using
an Omega Chromega E and 180mm Schneider Componon.
I won't go into it here, but 4x5 format is certainly
suitable for panoramas (6x12cm graflock backs are
widely available), and so is 8x10 format. Even if you
don't have a darkroom, large format prints can be
scanned--and are suitable for large murals.
Last suggestion... for quality approaching a scanned
2+1/4 negative, I would not rule-out a Canon 8MP
Powershot camera. The new top-of-the-line Powershot
has "L" glass, makes a huge digital image, and has
specific provisions for shooting panoramas.
I'm going to stick with My Kodak #1.<div></div>