maxhaynes
-
Posts
612 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by maxhaynes
-
-
I like this idea of a third rating, the originality score is rarely used that way, more as a
secondary idea, in fact, it seems like some folks don't know what the word means. It
would be nice if originality marks were for just that. What about not having to rate in
each category? Great technique on that boob shot, but it's not an original boob.
-
You guys are both right. Actually, I didn't know there was an abuse section but it's not
worth bothering further with, thanks.
-
I'm wondering about the idea of rating yourself a 4.5. If that's all the better you think
of your images, wouldn't refrain from posting them? I go from the assumption that
everyone thinks their own stuff is at least very good. When I am rating pictures, I
almost never give a 4 or less, I just don't rate that picture at all. It's onlt when
someone posts something truly offensive that I would issue less than a 4, I have
learned that it stings when someone flings a 2 or a 1 or even a 3 at your feet.
-
Does anyone know who AlF alien is? He gave me a 1/2 rating on one of my photos
that was rated high by almost everyone else. When I emailed him to find out why, the
address stated as his- grackle@torg.com, came back as not being a real address. He
has no pictures posted but he seems to enjoy giving people bad ratings. His average
is 3.36/3.47.
On one of his critques he goes by the name Randy. This seems like kind of a nasty
thing to do, get an alias and then hand out bougus ratings to people. Anything we
can do about old Alfie?
-
-
I'd sure like to have one more choice in the gallery search. I'd like to be able to see
the newest portfolios so I can see what has just come in rather than searching
through all the porfolios to the end.
Thanks!
Max
Force criticism on poor ratings
in PhotoNet Site Help
Posted
I have to disagree with Mr. O'Neill, 5 is good which means 4 is less than good. 3
sucks and 2 and 1 are reserved for sending someone a strong message that you don't
like the photo. That's the reality that I'm living in. I almost never give ratings unless I
can give at least a 5. In terms of critiques, I complained about this woman's lack of
sensitivity and she tore me a new one while slandering my name across her porfolio
and others! I won't soon do that again. I can tell when one of my images is a stinker,
it takes a long time to reach ten rates because the best photographers don't give out
poor ratings.