van_t.

September 22, 2001

Nice!

August 28, 2001

I believe fill-flash was used (there're hints of "red-eye" flash reflections on the eyes and on the apple). Aside from that, It's nicely exposed, although maybe abit on the bright side. I think it would have been even nicer w/just ambient light & w/o use of flash.

July 4, 2001

Are you sure you used a shutter speed of 1/750 sec?

I used 1/320 sec and 1/400 sec shutter speeds and I was able to pretty much freeze the wing action on my hummingbird pics. So I would think 1/750 sec would have freeze it even better and have it not look blurred out like in yours.

June 4, 2001

Was just there today. I, too, notice the interesting perspectives of this particular display.

April 21, 2001

However, the picture seems to not have enough real defining contrast. A yellow filter would have helped.

April 19, 2001

overexposed and soft. Still nice :]

April 18, 2001

If u actually used natural lighting - u did a good job.

April 9, 2001

Sharp and technically sound picture. Just doesn't hold my attention though. Perhaps what really turn me off is somehow this picture almost carries with it an advertising sales tone like that seen in motocycle magazines. POW status as a technically good picture is understandable; but as an piece of photographic art - it is very questionable. Personally, this is the kind of pictures that I wouldn't mind seeing less of.

March 29, 2001

I like it. A little more foreground would be more interesting.

March 27, 2001

Nice and clean picture. Would have been nice if it was sharper. OK now, 'fess up, what aftermarket lens did u use? (just kidding)

March 27, 2001

Closer shot would add more impact. Image also appears not sharp. Was the IS feature employed in this shot? or was it your scanner? If the IS feature was used and not because of your scanner - it didn't seem to work.