alekos_elefteriadis

Hornman...

excellend. 7/7

Bend left,more contrast,watch the dust.

Excelent tonality.

Good only little bend left and back.

good composition,the yellow leafs deceit the colours and the girl is little bit blue.If this is you like o.k.but for better balance the picture need yellow.

Dont cut the neck and the knee,is lack of beauty.

cleverness.

This picture no have something sharp.Also need something with differend color to make contrast with red.

good b&w, only the angle of the smoke together with the cloud, bend a little right the picture.

nice,just watch the green cast.

Good tonality but no have something to tell..

The circle in background take the attention.Is better if you crop the left side.But anyway good feeling.

I prefer a widder aperture for blurer background,or maybe you lens no have good bokeh.

It's contrast and the object is ordinary.Something missing.

The first column is bend.

I'm sorry that i'didnt give you any comment.Well the picture is ordinary, contrast is high so the detail in shadow and high light is lost.If you look my rate in all the photo that i critique, you understant that i give very few times better than 4,that hapen because i think the people hear give very easy 5,6,7 without careful critique.I see a lot of picture that have nothing to tell in thematology and represent only in good tonality or sharpness or good post proggesing, that picture is the reflex of the good technical knowledge,but the photography is not only technical approach, need also personality with something new to offer.I'm tired to look the same copyist style from ansel adams, bresson or wat ever, i want to see something new and when i so i put 5-7.I am here to watch the progrees in photography and i want toughness critique for all, because that keep us vigilance.By the way, for my pictures i don't believe they deserve something better than 2-4 and few of them 5-6.

so...

something missing...

comfused colour.

nice felling because of the color.Maybe also is good and b&w.

If you look my rate in all the photo that i critique, you understant that i give very few times better than 4,that hapen because i think the people hear give very easy 5,6,7 without careful critique.I see a lot of picture that have nothing to tell in thematology and represent only in good tonality or sharpness or good post proggesing, that picture is the reflex of the good technical knowledge,but the photography is not only technical approach, need also personality with something new to offer.I'm tired to look the same copyist style from ansel adams, bresson or wat ever, i want to see something new and when i so i put 5-7.I am here to watch the progrees in photography and i want toughness critique for all, because that keep us vigilance.By the way, for my pictures i don't believe they deserve something better than 2-4 and few of them 4-5.

Excelent portret,good tonality,i think a litle bit over sadow on the neck

good trak