g._r._gooderham

Thanks again. What I actually do is try assigning until i see which one best matches the colors I saw when the photo was taken and usually RGB 1998 is the best match, with this said I then convert to the RGB 1998 color space. Sorry if if i missname some of this but am I on the right track? I have redone the adobe Gamma 2 times to double check. I am still getting a miss matched color, red is not red but rather orange or pinkish depending on which i use.

Hi Ed.

Thank you for this, Let me clarify( and yes I had downloaded the profiles from Ilford). My Photo starts out as an sRGB, I assign then convert to RBG 1998.( which is also my working space).

In print with preivew I use:

color management - selected

source space - document = RGB 1998

Print space - Here Is where I have tried both RGB 1998 and the Classic Pearl profiles and get different printed colors then my screen color.

I also used the proof set up and there seems to be no real color change in switching back and forth it is just in the final print.

In my Canon software driver I only select what the Classic pearl instructions recommend for ; paper type etc. all color managemnt is off in the driver.

Thanks again... but still mystified

I am having a great deal of trouble matching colors ( screen to

print)For example what I have on screen is a Red truck.

I assign document a to adobe(rgb) 1998 profile, set print space to

the CP profile, set the recommended settings in the driver software

to the CP profile. I get a slightly pink version of red

I assign document adobe(rgb)1998 profile, set print space to the

adobe 1998 profile, set the recommended settings in the driver

software to CP.I get a more orange red. Niether matches.

I have tried assigning srgb with the same although duller results.

I use Adobe photoshop CS( several years experience),NEC monitor (

calibrated with Adobe Gamma).

Can anyone suggest some way to match these up better.

Thanks

I have a Sunpak auto 433d flash for minolta but a nikon f80 camera

body. Can I use this flash on this body?

Is it adapatable?

If you know where I might find information about this can you post

the address here?

Thank you

I have a Sunpak auto 433d for minolta but a nikon f80 camera. Can I

use this flash on this body?

I have a Sunpak auto 433d for minolta but a nikon f80 camera. Can I

use this flash on this body?

This maybe a silly question ( I hope not)

I have a Sunpak auto 433d for minolta but a nikon 80 camera.

Can Iuse this flash on this body?

I live in northern Ontario and am looking for a good , dependable lab

to process film ( 35mm, slide and color Neg.)and scan to cd. I want

to print 8x10 at minimum so Resolution about 300. I figure a file size

of about 15 mb should suffice. I have tried TCN and not yet happy with

them. Has anyone had experience or suggestions .

Thank you

Gerrz

Hi bob

OK I found it, little did i know this route, it would be nice to post these instructions and changes on the main page . I am glad to still see this option available. I do support this site and would gladly pay more to see it continue . It is a valuable asset that a few years ago was not available to aspiring photographers.Without this site how would we ever see some of the truely wonderful photos people display and if it is not about "looking and seeeing " then why do we take pictures? If the digital age brings forth too many " photographers" so be it. As my gradmother used to say " from the compost pile rich rewards are sown".

Thanks

Hi Bob

Maybe i am missing something What link to "Random photos"?

I have to agree with those that dislike the new gallery.I miss the random image section that used to come up when I clicked the gallery section also. I always viewed the random and recent uploads as a way to see fresh work, IT WAS A GREAT FEATURE. PLEASE PUT IT BACK.I have a slow connectin ( no dsl in my area) and to browse thru portfolios is not always rewarding or time effective to me.I to have found some truely exciting photographers through the gallery. PLEASE CHANGE IT BACK

Thank you

Hi all

Thank you for the quick response, I appreciate now the "under paid, over worked " problem and sorry for being a bug. I certainly was not interested in"just an icon by my name" I greatly respect what this site does and truely believe in suppoting it as I have contributed so many photos and gotten much in return. I believe in supporting this site we will help keep a good thing getting better .

Thanks again

I need some help... I subscribed (joined) last week but still do not

show up as a member here. I have sent 3 e-mails through this sight

with no response and the phone number given for help does not seem

to work!

Can anyone assist me further?