roberto_carli

Few time ago, an Italian master ,suggest 1600 iso 1/500.

Should work but you have two body not perfect for sport shoots.

You have to buy a professional camera,and markII is still better than new markIII.and you

save much money!

EOS 3 before, 1V and 1D then ,was the best AF for Canon.

We still waiting(unfortunatly) for a new camera(Canon) with such AF system.

At that time(when born EOS1D) many sport Nikon shooters,change to Canon;more or less will

happen now with the new Nikon D3;many guys are looking at,with sad eyes,the new 51

points AF Nikon.

If you are looking for a perfect AF ,get EOS3 at once( so much better than F90x and 10D AF)

a great camera body indeed.

I think you should be able to get a good 1Ds2(second hand) for less than 5000$ ,but if it'is

really(new) 6000$ the matter is over,you have to get a 5D.

1Ds2 pro: have a bigger file,and autofocus works very well and better than 5D.1Ds2 vs:file

more noise and heavy weight.In my opinion, if you have a cheap possibility,get it.

1Ds3 ,at moment,is the best camera you can buy,but too expansive.

Duracell 2650 mah rechargeable

Work very fine,and very fast;i am able to complete a whole wedding session with two battery set.

Jeff

" why are most of the sports shooters still using them? " .Very simple Jeff,there wasn't a valid alternative; unfortunatly for Canon ,now is came: with D3 sports shooters solve their problems.

I heard AFP,worldwide photo agency,of Italy return to Canon at least 30 camera body, changing in D3 Nikon..... I think this is only the first step ,many other will came,if Canon will not improve AF of recent Cameras.

JEFF

your answer is not silly ,but you have to consider The last three top sport Cameras Canon

have always problems with AF tracking, and now stop to test cameras for a big brand,you

have to always go to set to CPS center ,i am tired to lose money in that way.

The old 1D worked in excellent way,why Canon have done step behind and Nikon forward?

If i get an out of focusing with 1D i know if my mistake,but now i know if a Canon mistake

and for me it's enough to change;but you are sure to work many years more with nikon

D3,for sure!

First of all Thks to everybody who replyt this post.

To explain better my actual standing:

I am a pro,with many lenses and two top Canon camera body,that means nothing,because

when you talk about Photos you have to make an informed decision based upon real world

reports and experience ,As well as ALAN MYERS suggests; that's true ,in my opinion is the

real matter!

So doesn't matter if i am Canonist or Nikonist,the present is Nikon is at least the same lvl

of Canon,but imho,with D3 is now one step forward,regard noise and AF precision and

stability too.

I think to get less lenses to contain costs,but for my need ,at present Nikon is better than

Canon.

Best regards to everybody.

Is there anyone who can tell me why is a wrong choice?

I get many pictures with D3,above all sport shots.. At present there isn't a Canon camera as well.

I have Canon since 1994

Thks for ur opinion.

<a href="http://www.robertocarli.com">

Sure Michael i agree,everyone have an ideal camera to use for what they need,there are many

differences from reporters.... what i look for in a camera isn't what you look for or need,but

when you pay over 4000$ for a camera i think you have to get full satisfaction because you

work with it.

FOR MICHAEL LICZBANSKI

you're right Rob Galbraith is a reviewer,but for first time Canon Inc has admitted the error!

from the delivery of 1D(one of best accuracy AF ) the next Canon camera don't work as

well as The name (Canon) suggest.

In that period Canon was without competition,the best Nikon camera was D2H,very far

from Canon AF.

But now with the D3 the game is changed,and Nikon AF is an excellent and stable way to

use AF in sport shots.

I am considering to move in Nikon system,as well as many Nikonists move to Canon some

year ago.

My care is not to have Canon or Nikon but only have a reliable camera to shot in sport

event.

i am very tired to test with my money ,new cameras for Canon.I am CPS and every time(in

last period) i bought new camera(1DmII,1DmIIN),have to gone to the technical support.

I shot above all sport photos,but not only,and after testing 1DmIII can say it still not

working well,and not only in sunny and hot areas but even inside cold palasports.

<a href="http://www.robertocarli.com">www.robertocarli.com</a>

U said:"I contacted the hosting company and it was removed immediately."

I ask you:and if those wasn't removed immediately,what should you done?

Can u explain me better the "blogs" mean?

Many thks.

Dear all,

<p>I have found many of my pictures which I uploaded only to

Photo.Net in two different web site I didn't seen before. Here the

links:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="http://bdpsphoto.net/bbs41p4/view.php?

id=interst&no=53">site nr 1</a></p></blockquote>

<blockquote><p><a

href="http://kr.blog.yahoo.com/lavenderhills917/880911.html">site nr

2</a></p></blockquote>

<p>I already asked to the photo.net administrators (Brian) how could

this happened 'cause I know all my photos are copyright protected and

I belived Pboto.Net should in some way protect my copyrights.</p>

<p>Is there anyone out there which have any idea on the above sites

and how this could happen? Who do u suggest me to do?</p>

Thnks a lot.

Is there anyone can tell me how to do to delete from my folder

Landscapes my new shot post this morning but with these troubles:

HTTP/1.0 500 Internal Server Error Content-Type: text/html;

charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:43:34

GMT Server: NaviServer/2.0 AOLserver/3.3.1+ad13 Content-Length: 547

Connection: close

Is it only my troubles,or other guys have it?

I want to know some impressions on new 70 200 is 2.8.In my opinion

the AF mode is very slowier than older 70 200 2.8 not is.

Is there anyone that tested both lenses ( 70 200 2.8 is and not )

Thks