Jump to content

diser

Members
  • Posts

    183
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by diser

  1. <p>Comparing Kadlubek's and McKeown's (I have both latest editions), I can say that M is more accurate in details (shutter speeds, f/, etc). K also has a lot of mix ups with SLR or RF markings and doesn't have any historical information (except years) about cameras or their manufacturers.<br>

    At the same time, K has more "newer" (post 2000) cameras and has a greater camera variety from the major manufacturers. Though, M did mention that they are not including all the cameras they have in the database, becase a lot of them are not collectible yet, or never were considered as such, and book is too thick already.</p>

  2. <p>I've never heard about original gold-plated Leica II cameras. Most of these cameras are fake. If you've actually got a real gold-plated Leica II and you are 100% positive it's Leica, it must have been "painted" later, after the manufacture and most likely not by the Leitz Company.</p>
  3. <p>Zeiss Ikon Contax S - first SLR with pentaprism, first camera with M42 mount;<br>

    Topcon RE Super - first TTL SLR camera;<br>

    Ernemann Ermanox - fastest lens on SLR camera at the time of manufacture (2.0 and 1.8);<br>

    Gamma Works Duflex - first SLR with instant return mirror;<br>

    Hasselblad 1600F - first trully modular SLR.<br>

    <a href="http://historical-cameras.blogspot.com/search/label/SLR">http://historical-cameras.blogspot.com/search/label/SLR</a></p>

  4. <p>Rising prices could be because of the inflation, not because of the increasing value... Also, that may be true for some "workhorse" cameras, but not for the colletible ones. I don't see prices going up for them. If anything, they go down or stay the same.</p>
×
×
  • Create New...