ned
-
Posts
82 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by ned
-
-
<p>Hi John, I was using some new Maha Powerex 2700 mAh NiMH batteries. I previously posted comments on my blog that I'd noticed some folks were having problems with the K-x recognizing different battery types at start-up. As I said, we'd be looking into this. We do listen to feedback from the market, and at this point that's all I'm really able to say.</p>
-
<p>Miserere, thanks for your feedback and we must have similar likes, as that " E-rust" abstract was my favorite image from the session. I've already saved it as a TIF file and plan to print it on some 13x19 Epson Velvet Fine Art paper.</p>
-
<p>We had a beautiful day in Colorado and it gave me a chance to visit the Colorado Railroad Museum in Golden. I spent about two hours walking around with the K-x and a FA77mm taking photos to give you a feeling for the place, as well as seeing how the K-x performed with this lens.<br>
I posted about 30 photos on my blog, and if you're interested, you can check them out <a href="http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2009/11/colorado-railroad-musuem.html">K-x and FA77 Photos</a> here.<br>
Cheers,<br>
Ned</p>
-
<p>Andrew,<br>
Thanks for the catch. I edited my blog copy to correct the 100mm macro designation to "FA" :-)<br>
Ned</p>
-
<p>R.T.<br>
Thanks for the link to that Best Buy page and that "review". It puzzles me why some people do these things, but what he claims is 100% pure rubbish.<br>
Ned</p>
-
<p>Peter,<br>
Thanks. LOL, it wasn't that tough a decision to use the FA 100 macro and the FA 77mm. I was trying to say that the way these lenses render images is quite well known, so one could eliminate any potential negative impact from the lens to these first test images.<br>
I'm certainly not opposed to participating in a Q&A session here. My only concern is being able to reply to the questions in a timely manner.<br>
Ned</p>
-
<p>I just posted my <a href="http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2009/10/my-first-k-x-test-shots.html">First K-x Test Photos</a> and some comments on my blog, if anyone is interested in checking it out.<br /> Cheers,<br /> Ned</p>
-
<p>David,<br>
Mark's housing is made by SPL Waterhousing in San Diego (http://www.splwaterhousings.com). I had a chance to visit their facility, as we provided SPL originally with a K10D body so they could build the first housing which Mark started to work with. SPL builds quality housings ideal for surfing and on water photography. I have not talked to the folks at SPL in several years, but depending how many controls (buttons) you want access to and the number of lens domes you'll need, I believe their housings start at around $1200-1400. Hope this helps.<br>
Regards,<br>
Ned Bunnell</p>
-
As others like Godfrey have pointed out, both are good lenses. The DA70 "pancake" is
smaller and I find that appealing as I generally prefer to travel light. Here are links to two
sets of photos taken with the DA70, if you want to see a range of sample photos.
<p>
<a href="http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2007/06/san-clemente-car-show.html">San
Clemente Car Show</a>
<p>
<a href="http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2006/10/amsterdam-with-da-70mm-
pancake.html">Amsterdam</a>
<p>
Ned
-
Simon, although I did this test last November with a K10D and 200mm f/2.8, it might still be
helpful to you. <a href="http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2006/11/k10d-shake-reduction-
sample.html">SR test</a>
<p>
Cheers,
Ned
-
Thomas,
Sorry, can't help you with 645D pricing. It has not been set. I can offer that we'll likely be
quite competitive in price vs the 31 mp Hassey, but no where near the $3-5k I've seen a few
folks speculate on as the likely pricing on some photo forums. If one does a little research,
you can find that the Kodak 31 mp sensor is not an inexpensive component.
Ned
-
Hi Thomas,
Thanks and truth be known the vacation was far better than my photos :-)
There have been several published articles in Japan about the Pentax and Tokina
relationship, most recently when we announced the Fisheye 10-17 last year. However, I'm
not sure the articles have been translated.
Pentax and Tokina do have a lens development agreement. The goal of this relationship is
by leveraging the combined resources of both companies, Pentax can increase the
availability of new lenses. Based on the engineering teams expertise, some lens designs
are being done by Pentax and some are done by Tokina. The quality goal for these new
lenses is very high, as I think has been evidenced by reviews of the new Pentax lenses that
have been released in the past year and half.
Hope this helps,
Cheers,
Ned
-
I had an opportunity to take the 50-135mm lens on my vacation to Mexico. I've posted a few sample
images from this lens that I shot with the K10D. I've posted the photos on my blog if anyone is interested.
<p>
<a href="http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2007/03/test-photos.html">50-135 test photos</a>
<p>
<a href="http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2007/03/bygone-era.html">More 50-135 test photos</a>
<p>
Cheers,
Ned
-
This article on Luminous Landscape is quite old, but it addresses your question about the
quality of the 31mm.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-02-05-02.shtml
Cheers,
Ned
-
Andrew,
Another vote for Don Goldberg / DAG camera. I sent my M4 to him last fall for a cla and he did a beautiful job.
Good Luck,
Ned
-
Although you indicate you're spoiled by automatic digicams, a nicely maintained M2, M3
or M4 would be a nice change of pace. My personal favorite is the M4. Good Luck!
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2005/04/best-camera-ever.html
-
<P><img src="http://www.bunnellphotography.com/photos/Leica%20Images%20from%2070s/5LG.jpg"></P>
M4/50/Tri-X
-
-
-
Oh, here's a backstage view of Carmen with Dave Navarro [grin]...
<P><img src="http://www.bunnellphotography.com/photos/Frankie%20B.%20Fashion%20Show/45LG.jpg"></p>
-
Ok, here's one...
<P><img src="http://www.bunnellphotography.com/photos/Frankie%20B.%20Fashion%20Show/43LG.jpg"></P>
-
<P><img src="http://www.bunnellphotography.com/photos/Leica%20Images%20from%2070s/16LG.jpg"></P>
1972; M4 & Tri-X
-
hmm, the clothes have changed a bit (1972/M4/Tri-X)...
<P><img src="http://www.bunnellphotography.com/photos/Leica%20Images%20from%2070s/2LG.jpg"></P>
-
Thanks John. pH level of 5.0 - 6.0, but were you asking about the soil? [grin]
Digital Filters with K-x and K-7
in Pentax
Posted
<p>I posted a few comments on my blog about Velvet Fine Art prints I made from images using the in-camera "monochrome" + "toy camera" filter. If you haven't tried these filters, and have any interest in learning more about their potential, here's a link to my post: <a href="http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2010/02/prints-from-toy-camera-image.html">Toy Camera Filter Effects</a></p>
<p>Cheers,<br>
Ned</p>