peter_daalder

Mike, <a href="http://www.photo.net/site-feedback-forum/00Nggm">this thread </a> from December 2007, might be of

interest to you.<br> An overhaul, or replacement, of the category system might be one of the things that are

under consideration.

<p>Meanwhile, is there an explanation for the continued existence

of <a href="http://www.photo.net/photo-critique-forum/?category=uncategorized"> this link </a> on the Critique Forum

page?

Came across <a href="http://brentbat.blogspot.com/2008/07/shutter-blending-splash.html"> this technique,</a>

earlier today.<p>I thought that it was an idea/technique worth sharing in this forum...

<a href="http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK">Here.</a>

I had no trouble finding this model at Amazon.

G'day Jeff,<p>I'm wondering if we have both experienced the same annoying advertisement...<br>The one that I am

referring to, is not a popup, but rather one of the rollover variety.<p>I was browsing the Gallery late on

Thursday night and whilst viewing individual images, one of these advertisements appeared on the right hand side

of the page, in the area below the photo(s).<br>In general, I don't pay much attention to any advertisements and

certainly

didn't expect that an Adobe Flash Player application was about to get underway, after I unwittingly passed my

mouse over that area of the screen.<p>Suddenly, this rather <b>loud</b> epic movie music started coming from my

speakers,

followed by the voice over. <br>To say that I was startled by it, is putting it mildly...<p>The advertisement in

question, can be found on <a href="http://www.meetthelocals.com.au/">this site.</a> If you <b>click</b> on the little

video screen at bottom right (don't just point at it), which carries the title "The Locals", you can view this

video. If you minimize (bottom right) the full screen view, you can get a fair idea of how the add appeared on

the photo.net pages.<p>As is often the case, I can't find any of these rollover advertisements on PN tonight. Of

course...

<div></div>

Michael, <a href="http://www.photo.net/site-feedback-forum/00QfCZ"> read this.</a>

<i>I am now still debating between Bit Defender and ESET. </i><p>

I have been using ESET for more than three years now.<br>It has been extremely efficient/reliable and the company also provides excellent tech support, down here in Australia.

<i>For the past day or so,</i><p>

Michael, I guessing that you were trying to view images around the time that Josh posted

 

<a href="http://photonetnews.blogspot.com/2008/08/router-issue-causes-site-downtime.html">the following message</a> on the Photo.net Community News & Updates site.

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

You can't. <a href="http://www.photo.net/site-feedback-forum/00P2BI"> Look here.</a>

It appears that John's question has been answered by today's <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/08/21/canon-50d-info-leaked-real-specs/"> breaking news.</a>

<div></div>

G'day John,<p><i>I have been using canon equipment for the past 10+ years and happy with the quality of there equipment</i><p>

I think that is all that matters...<br>Sure, I appreciate that the LCD on my Canon 5D is larger than either of my previous DSLRs, but the (apparent) lack of pixels doesn't particularly bother me. At best, it only needs to give me some indication of the histogram. I carefully frame the image through the viewfinder and don't have a need to re-check the composition on the LCD.<p> Of course, that is just my opinion.

<div></div>

After addressing a similar topic in <a href="http://www.photo.net/digital-camera-shopping-forum/00PlNy"> this thread </a> I now use <a href="http://www.tabletopstudio.com/documents/jewelry_photography.htm"> these pages </a> as my default reference guide to this kind of subject matter.

After visiting your photo.net Community Page, I would like to recommend that you update your personal website

info from your photo.net Workspace - Update your personal information page.<p>When linking to your Image Pro

site, use the full link: i.e. <a

href="http://imagepro.photography.com/K4JJJW">http://imagepro.photography.com/K4JJJW</a>

Disregard the first link. It should have been <a href="http://www.imagepro.photography.com/kristinakulawright"> this page. </a>

Kristina, you'll find that your Image Pro workspace is private. <br>I'm assuming that you landed on <a

href="www.imagepro.photography.com/kristinakulawright"> this page, </a> whilst your web browser still had an

active cookie for the Image Pro website.<br>When anyone else goes to the linked page, they'll be presented with

the login screen.<p>You will also find that your name is listed on the Image Pro <a

href="http://www.imagepro.photography.com/pbp/public/photographerDirectory.ipro?cid=18380"> Photographers

Directory</a> page.

The appearance of the updated used to be almost instant, <a href="http://www.photo.net/site-feedback-forum/00PnNy"> but it now takes some time,</a> before it comes into effect.<br>However, at the same time, on the matter of editing/replacing images, also keep <a href="http://www.photo.net/site-feedback-forum/00QI1N"> the following point of view</a> in mind.

<div></div>