Jump to content

bernard_wiessner

Members
  • Posts

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bernard_wiessner

  1. Does anyone know the shelf life of Wimberleys WD2D+ developer?

    I have some that is a year old in the formulary bottles.They are

    filled to the top and both liquids look clear.I read that some

    developers dont change color as they age.I would like to use it but

    hate to ruin a roll of film.Any suggestions?.Thank You

  2. Hi Ward

    Sorry about that. Yes I meant the A and B not mixed but kept apart in there own bottles. I think that when the two solutions are mixed they should be used right away. Although Hutchings claims they can sit for about an hour before before use to give the film more stain.

    Thanks

  3. I see where the the makers of non solvent high definition developers

    call for a higher ASA with their development times for most films.

    What can I expect if I use the standard ASA? I know this would be

    overexposing,but would it be overdeveloping as well?

     

    Thanks to all

  4. I have been looking through a lot of film and developing time charts

    and have seen Extol used at 1+1,1+2 and 1+3.However, with D76 or ID11

    the dilutions are allways 1+1 or 1+3.Has anyone tried D76 or ID11 at

    1+2.I thought I would try it and split the difference with the

    developing time. Just curious.

     

    Thanks to all

  5. I have been using D76 for for some time now and I like the

    results.However,I am tired of mixing chemicals.Is there a liquid

    developer that would give me the same results other than Sprint? I

    have also wondered why Kodak never made D76 in a liquid concentrate.I

    thought I saw somewhere that it was available in Europe but I'm not

    really sure.

    Thanks to all

  6. Get the book "The film developing cookbook" by Steve Anchell and Bill Troop.Pages 37 and 38 give a very good explanation of stand development.Actually the entire book is excellent.Although they recommend slow or medium speed film,I had very good results with Ilfords HP5 and Delta 400 developed in Patersons FX2.My 35mm neg's are very sharp with good tones from the high to low densities.Yes, this really works but one has to realize that this is just another method of developing film to get a desired result.Checking through all my prints I cant really say they are any better than what I get using my normal developing times with PMK or Ilfosol s or other film and developer combinations.However,I do find it enjoyable to try other combinations even if the results are very near the same.

    Good luck with your efforts.

  7. I have used PMK with HP5,Delta 400 and Delta 100 and also with Neopan 400.I usually over expose 1/3 or 1/2 a stop. I get a yellow green stain stain not too dark although the stain seems to vary between different films.This afternoon I souped a role of TRI X and the stain was much darker.I'll call it dark olive. My question is this. Does TRI X always stain this Dark and is there such a thing as too much stain? I din't change my processing methods. Maybe this is a little premature. I'll make some prints tomorrow. Up to now I have been very happy with my PMK prints.I'm getting excellent shadow and highlight detail and all the grays in the middle.Although I have good results with D76 1+1,Rodinal, FX 39,Ilfotec DDX,Dixactol and Ilfosol s I think the merging of tones are slightly better with PMK. I enjoy reading all the forum postings and have gathered much information.

     

    Thanks to all and much good luck

×
×
  • Create New...