Jump to content

paolo_folzani

Members
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by paolo_folzani

  1. I look for a 21mm for my M7 and I need your suggestions: can you say

    me differences of rendition between 21/4 SA, 21/3,4, 21/2,8 and

    21/2,8 asph. (contrast, sharpness, bokeh...)?

    I love the results and the glow of my cron 35 8 elements and my cron

    50 dual range: are the SA 4 and the 3,4 similar to my old lenses?

    And can I use its with aperture priority without problems?

    Thank you for your answer.

  2. Last year in Eritrea many photos resulted slightly underexposed (I

    think for strong sun influence on the meter) or with faded colors,

    especially in first afternoon hours. May be I go in Maroc next month:

    which filter do you suggest me to have colors more warm? For BW, what

    effect have yellow or orange filters on black face? Thank you.

  3. I had the same problem some years ago with my R4 nr. 1608xxx.

    Shutter stayed opened not only in A, but also in manual mode, in T and P, every 4-5 shots. Leica repair said me I had to change all electronic part and costs were more than the worth of the camera. I sold at half price and I bought a R7.

    Best regards.

    Paolo

  4. Matt, I had the same dilemma when I had to choose between M2 and M3. I bought M2 simply because 35mm is the lens I use more and I'm very satisfied of my choice. But for telephoto and portrait of course M3 is more precise and easier to focus (now for this I use R7 with 100 and 180, but it another body, another system and another money ...) In any case, before selling a mint M3 I'd think 2 times: try it again for some months to discovery her soul, then you'll decide. May be you'll save some money and you'll keep both the bodies (best solution). Best regards. Paolo
  5. I have a fantastic M2 with 35,50,90. I'd like to buy another body (M7

    or M6TTL) but also in the future an ultrawide angle 21mm and a 135mm.

    Please suggest me: for you is better a body 0.85 with the 135 and the

    21mm with the viewfinder on M2, or the new body 0.58 with the 21mm

    and the 135 with the viewfinbder on M2?

    Thank you for your answers.

    Paolo

  6. Mark, this spring I have been in Eritrea with my dear old M2 and 35/2, 50/2.8, 90/2.8. Camera was really handy and light, but in some situation I'd like a lens wider then 35mm and, to make portraits of islamic women, I nedeed a tele as 135 or 180. In any case, good travel at you and at your girlfriend and don't forget absolutely lightmeter (if you choose M2).

    Paolo

    P.S. Go in Bolivia!

  7. Dear boys,

    I've found an Elmarit R 135/2.8 Wetzlar in good conditions (n.

    2,305,...). I'd like to own a 135mm lens because is very versatile

    for portraits and not so heavy us the 180. What do You think about

    this Leica lens (made in 1968)? And what would be his worth?

    Thank You very much for the answer. Paolo

  8. Dear Leica-lovers, I have a 24 elmarit R but I'm not very satisfied. Pictures are not so surprising like with other Leica lenses (infact 24/2.8 is in practice a Minolta lens!). If I change (secondhand of course), I'd prefer a wider lens as 19 or 21. Can anyone suggest me about the 21/4 or 19/2.8 (new and old version)? Thank You for Your answer. Paolo
×
×
  • Create New...