<p>As Don Bright suggested, MF owners tend to be more 'settled', for lack of a better term. I pretty much gave up 35mm film twenty-five years ago when I realized the large prints I was seeing in nature and landscape galleries were being captured by MF and large format film systems. I shot M and LF film for quite a number of years, with a Pentax 645N being my MF equivalent of a travel camera when I could not lug the LF system around. Even today, having given up film because of the lack of high quality labs, many of my best selling images remain from my film days.</p>
<p>I shot my last MF film three years ago when the lab I used, recognized as one of the best in the country and located in Los Angeles, announced they would no longer process E6. I still owned my 645n and all the lenses, and made the move to the 645D, with absolutely no regrets. In spite of the nitpicks about processing speed, etc., it is a stunning performer. For situations where more speed and agility is required I use a Pentax K3.</p>
<p>I think that successful photographers achieve a level of self-confidence about their photography, work flow, skill set, etc, that after a period of time enables them to recognize what is required to capture an image they have pre-visualized. Typically the latest Canikon body is not the solution. Photography, as a serious hobby, as opposed to a business, is much like high end audio. Audiophiles are always looking for the holy grail (reproducing a live performance in the home) and of course, it will never happen, although it can come very close if you have a couple of hundred K$ to spend and the appropriate acoustic environment. Likewise, the latest body with the newest sensor is not a guarantee your photography will jump to the next level, aside from some improvements at the pixel level.</p>
<p>As for for MF discussion forums, I find WWW.GETDPI.COM to be a bit more useful for digital MF shooters than this site. </p>
<p> </p>