Jump to content

christel_green1

Members
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by christel_green1

  1. Allan - *sniff* - that was truly moving! I never realised the

    historical significance of the apostrophe.

     

    <p>

     

    I use Windows, and as you can imagine, I'm having problems - a lot of

    configurations have mysteriously changed themselves lately - such as

    my prized collection of Monty Python sound effects being replaced

    with default noises etc. It's no surprise to me if the keyboard

    configuration has been changed as well. IB4ve tried re-installing

    Windows, but no luck - I'll just have to keep my hands off that key.

     

    <p>

     

    Sorry Chris ;\

  2. I love the shadow too - and esp. the little burned out figure inside.

    Great shot!

     

    <p>

     

    I think the loudest concert I ever went to was Manowar - or maybe

    Motorhead - or Ronnie James Dio - or David Lee Roth etc. etc. etc.

    During the 80's I damaged my hearing permanently, but it was fun. Too

    bad I never thought to bring a camera along.

  3. Hmmm - although it's not exactly a concert shot, my absolute

    favourite is the one of Tim Mason with his daughter. Because it's a

    warm and loving portrait and maybe because I love adorable old

    hippies :)

    Lots of atmosphere in all the pics, and that's what counts IMO (not

    saying that theyB4re poor quality, because obviously theyB4re not)

  4. WhatB4s the matter with you guys!? Movie theatres are some of the best

    places to bring your camera because A: If people give you strange

    looks you canB4t see it anyway, and B: Since movie-goers are obliged

    to silence during the show, thereB4s very little chance that anybody

    will start to complain :)

     

    <p>

     

    How do I see in there? I donB4t really... Take a few test shots, check

    the LCD monitor to see if the camera is pointing in the right

    direction, and then go for the real thing. Ahh, the blessings of

    digital photography!

     

    <p>

     

    Jeff - a question about your image above. Is that two women talking

    or one woman in front of a mirror? I find it very intriguing, riddle

    and all :)

  5. Actually I like this a lot, and I like it much better than the less

    cropped version. The tight crop help focus the viewers attention on

    the same thing that the childs attention is focused on, and lets

    us "into his world" so to speak, which IMO is a very fine quality in

    a child portrait. Enough is visible of his eyes to show his

    concentration.

  6. uh-oh what can I say... Good models make it easier, don4t they :) The

    combination of the suit and crown is great. The light emphasizes his

    facial expression.

     

    <p>

     

    Actually you offer me a much needed opportunity to say a few words to

    a landscape zerox machine who had the kindness to inform me that I

    know nothing about photography and that I4m a joke (but he wasn4t

    laughing) because I don4t go oooh aaaah over his zerox copies.

     

    ok here4s the caption: "If mediocrity of mind, spirit and

    photographic vision is your lifes ambition, look no further, because

    you have surely reached fulfillment in a way most people can only

    dream about."

    Aaaaaaaaaah that was good :)

  7. Grain works for me in everything but nature macros :) Actually one of

    the (only) setbacks of going digital is the inability to create

    natural-looking grain.

    I4ll probably be the only one to say this, but I don4t think this

    portrait comes close to your usual high standards, mostly because of

    the model, I4m afraid - that goofy "I4m too sexy for my shirt" look

    is just too artificial.

  8. It really is a very accomplished portrait. What I like the most about

    it, is how it demonstrates the diversity of human form, even within a

    narrow definition. These two girls are probably the same age and live

    in the same kind of environment, yet they4re so different. What the

    picture represents, at least the way it seems to me, is simple

    appreciation of who they are. That4s a nice feeling to get from a

    portrait.

  9. Yeah, shooting blind - one of my favourite things :) I think your

    second image has "it" - whatever that is - and is really memorable.

    The first one seems to me to be just another candid shot of just

    another pretty face... Maybe I4m biased.

    Two of my own favourite shots were made this way, but ofcourse I4m

    not as hardcore as you guys - I cropped later. It4s <A

    HREF="http://www.crosswinds.net/~rightside/black/image18.htm">"Walking

    "</A>, which was shot with the camera dangling free on it4s strap,

    and <A

    HREF="http://www.crosswinds.net/~rightside/black/image22.htm">"Shelter

    ", where I had eyed the subject and had an idea of what I wanted, but

    was too timid too shoot openly :)

  10. Well I4ll have to say that there4s some difference beween my first

    viewing of this image - which was in the morning with sunlight

    hitting the monitor at full blast - and my present viewing in a pitch

    dark room. Let4s just say that I4m seeing a little more now :)

    I think it shows a moment of great realism. As the same time it is

    dreamy. I assume that the subject is a woman, but I can4t tell for

    sure which is a really great attraction for me.

  11. OHMIGAAAAWD! Another philosopher! I spent 6 years of my life studying

    philosophy and arrived at the conclusion that the here and now is all

    that matters - in life as well as photography... Now what was the

    question?

     

    <p>

     

    Oh yes, I friend or foe :) I4d say foe - or rather complete

    strangers. Friends and family are apt to pose and I don4t care much

    for posing. Since I began free-lancing for a small daily newspaper I

    have had some great opportunities and blown most of them. In any

    case, I prefer the "slice of life" shot.

  12. The legislation in my country (Denmark) states (as far as I4ve been

    informed) that whenever you are in a public area - such as street,

    beach, sports stadium, public transportation, whatever, you are a

    legit subject for anyone with a camera.

    There has been a case lately, which appeared in the news, about an

    elderly man who, half concealing a camera under his jacket, took

    pictures of big-breasted women on mainstreet in the city of Odense.

    Naturally this was not to the liking of neither his unwilling

    subjects nor local shop owners, but nothing could be done, since his

    photographs were perfectly legal. As far as I know, he is still

    practising his little "hobby" :)

    Another example I remember from only a few weeks back was one of the

    two national TV-channels showing footage which was obviously candid

    video of fat people undressing on the beach, as part of a news

    special about health problems related to overweight. Personally I

    found that one more offensive than the boob-loving street shooter.

    I guess, given these conditions, that I will never need to let

    anybody sign a release form...

  13. Thanks for looking at my pics - the blue and the tunnel one are my

    favourites too :)

    This one just happened to come out of my camera today - Canon

    PowerShot Pro70 with infrared filter - I like the softness of the

    features induced by IR.

     

    <IMG SRC="http://www.geocities.com/digital65/00bebs6.jpg">

    <BR>

     

    To Andy - nobody tunnels in rock in Denmark because we don4t have any

    bedrock. Denmark is basically just a muddy appendix to Germany :)

    This particular tunnel is from a marine life centre/research

    facility. It runs under part of a natural inlet and has windows to

    different types of marine biospheres - very interesting actually, if

    you4re into that sort of thing :)

×
×
  • Create New...