carl_weller
-
Posts
330 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by carl_weller
-
-
aaaahhh, its great to find another kiwi on the net!
<p>
one thing you might want to consider is whether or not the lovely
people in customs plan to screw you out of your savings with a hefty
tax bill. there must be a book or something that you can get from
customs for advice.
<p>
the 7e is also on my 'maybe' list. the vertical grip is cool,
especially if you've got big hands.
<p>
as to the lenses:
<p>
what i find is that i do most of my shooting in the 150-300mm range so
i can get a good tight shot without sitting right on top off what i'm
trying to photograph. when i need a wide-angle lens then its only
really for landscapes or architecture - then i just chuck the trusty
20mm on the camera.
<p>
i really find the intermediate focal lengths (basically everything
from 35mm to about 90mm)a bit too 'normal'. when you want a tight shot
use a tele (my fave is the 70-200 4.0 'cos its good AND won't force
your bank manager to put a contract out on you), for a wide shot use a
real wide angle (you'll freak if you see the difference between a 24mm
and a 20mm). later you can chuck a 50mm 1.8 (really good value) for
the normal shots. of course, this is a good deal more of an investment
than the 24-85mm.
<p>
why not think about waiting on the speedlight for a bit and getting
the 28-135mm IS? it hasn't got the low end on the wide angle, but
otherwise gives you far more possibilities in a single lense and lets
you leave the tripod at home or use slower film.
-
yup, i have to agree with george, the manual could be better.
<p>
but if you really want to get hold of one try www.manualsrus.com (i
think thats the address anyway) - costs something too, but probably
not 14 bucks.
-
wow! you've got exactly the same problem that i do (and probably about
a million other people i guess).
<p>
2 things to throw into the mix:
<p>
1).
<p>
the eos 3 is the oldest camera in the canon lineup, with a problem
similar to that of the rebel 2000 (which seems to have gone from
class-leader to somewhere in mid-field 'cos nikon and minolta have
upgraded theirs recently). yeah of course there's also the A2E - but,
come on, that things been around since '92 so it shouldn't even be
considered in a NEW camera purchase debate. when i look at how fast
the other manufacturers are moving i just hope canon get its ass into
gear sometime soon. not that the 3's not great - it is - but its great
technology from 1998! maybe thats the reason why the 3 is going so
cheap at the moment - to get rid of stockpiles before they bring out
the replacment.
<p>
2).
<p>
a camera is a light-tight box. the lens makes the picture. you can
probably get better pictures - of course with less custom features
etc. - by buying the 7e and a nice shiney new lens.
-
i bought the sigma for just that reason - and for travel photos it's
great, especially if you want to fit a lot in the frame
the extra 9 degrees of coverage a 24mm gives you are worth their
weight in gold(i used the 24mm setting mainly for architectural shots
in vienna and munich). and the 2.8 is of course great - once you've
had a zoom lens with a bit of speed you won't ever want to rejoin the
"coach-class" with their 3.5-5.6's. the results i have got with it (so
far only about 10 rolls of film) are just great - really proves what a
lot of people have been saying about the shit canon lenses say - yes i
said shit CANON lenses - that come with the kits most of start out
with.
<p>
what i can't tell you is whether its as good as the canon 28-80 2.8 -
probably not given the price difference AND THAT IS EXACTLY THE POINT.
if spending twice as much for what is probably a 5-10% increase in
quality is what turns you on then go and stand over there with the
"3rd party sucks" crowd. you gets what you pays for - all you have to
decide is how much you want to pay!
<p>
at the end of the day its whats on the photo, not what name is on the
lens. sometimes i wonder if the whole canon and nikon vs. the 3rd
party debate is not really some obscure form of equipment snobbery.
<p>
And when they say your sigma will be junk in 5 years SO WHAT! in 5
years they will have made quantum leaps in lens design and you can use
the money you saved not buying a canon lens to get yourself a nice new
3rd party lens once more - and improve your photography the real way
by taking more photos (that you can now afford to get developed 'cos
you're not saving like a madman for your lenses).
<p>
if i sound like an "i hate canon" loon, then you're in for a schock -
canon make fantastic lenses, and as soon as i win lotto i'll replace
all my 3rd party solutions with the real thing.
Is this a good combo?
in Canon EOS Mount
Posted
aaaahhh, its great to find another kiwi on the net!
<p>
one thing you might want to consider is whether or not the lovely
people in customs plan to screw you out of your savings with a hefty
tax bill. there must be a book or something that you can get from
customs for advice.
<p>
the 7e is also on my 'maybe' list. the vertical grip is cool,
especially if you've got big hands.
<p>
as to the lenses:
<p>
what i find is that i do most of my shooting in the 150-300mm range so
i can get a good tight shot without sitting right on top off what i'm
trying to photograph. when i need a wide-angle lens then its only
really for landscapes or architecture - then i just chuck the trusty
20mm on the camera.
<p>
i really find the intermediate focal lengths (basically everything
from 35mm to about 90mm)a bit too 'normal'. when you want a tight shot
use a tele (my fave is the 70-200 4.0 'cos its good AND won't force
your bank manager to put a contract out on you), for a wide shot use a
real wide angle (you'll freak if you see the difference between a 24mm
and a 20mm). later you can chuck in a 50mm 1.8 (really good value) for
the normal shots. of course, this is a good deal more of an investment
than the 24-85mm.
<p>
why not think about waiting on the speedlight for a bit and getting
the 28-135mm IS? it hasn't got the low end on the wide angle, but
otherwise gives you far more possibilities in a single lense and lets
you leave the tripod at home or use slower film.