geoffrey_swenson
-
Posts
290 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by geoffrey_swenson
-
-
Nothing wrong with that. Good photo! -
Very nice image. I have the feeling that the two-stop filter wasn't necessary in this case though. -
Correct me if I am wrong, but there is an obvious seam between the foreground and the sky. I so, the sky could have been more of a night sky with more stair trails. Not a bad image though.
-
Now, this is beautiful!
-
Easy. She has to go bad :-)) That is trouble enough! -
-
It is just good as it is. This picture is more than just a blah-blah post, it would also make a great print. Fine, balanced composition with good tones.
-
-
Hmmm. -
Most of your photographs could look great, however most forms are lost in a formulaic tar-like shadow. I guess you try to emulate the works of Caravaggio and Ribera among others, but their shadows are not as impenetrable as yours. Possible that in print these images are not as dark as the ones here, but here the small central figure is lost.
Also your other picture Preyer(sp) is just too dark and after a while all the other images start to look the same.
The essence of these photographs is good, only the execution needs improvement.
-
Have not we had enough?
-
Too much sky...(in this case).
-
Not as good as the previous.
-
Divine :-))
-
-
Are the flowers on the body or PhotoShopped on? -
Ditto here, and with double matting would even more successful.
-
Even though it is not a "real" photograph, it is somehow it is catchy. -
Must be a joke! Right?
-
Now this is one of those rare images very well done on an often seen subject. Superb rendition even if it is nothing new.
-
You Dirty Devil :-))
-
Very pretty! -
What can I say? This is very good.
So is the rest of your B&W folder.
-
Exceptionally pleasant image with brilliant golden tones.
White Door
in Uncategorized
Posted