sairam

Since we are talking cameras owned by famous people: would Mr. Josiah S. Carberry be the famous Brown University Professor of Psychoceramics by any chance? Or Mr. Howard Roarke the famous architect of Ayn Rand's "Fountainhead"? Just wondering ... :-)

Daniel,

 

The problem is in the negative; the print is a faithful inverse. Notice that only part of the negative is a positive - the lamp light in the top right is accurately rendered. Also the negative density is very weak - ie it is almost transparent, so that would indicate underexposure if anything isnt it, although I know I exposed reasonably for the lighting condition.

In a roll of T400CN I shot recently and had developed and printed at

Walmart, a couple of frames seem to have partly recorded a positive

image (seen as a negative in the print). See this link in my portfolio

if not visible below.

http://www.photo.net/photo/3902874

Details are under DETAILS.

 

Also of interest, this was the second frame, the first two frames had

this problem, the next 30 odd frames were perfect - see

http://www.photo.net/photo/3902938

- then the last few frames had a somewhat similar problem - see

http://www.photo.net/photo/3902949

All exposure details are under DETAILS.

 

One other note: this film was probably bought 2 years ago and

unexposed until last week and stored in a closet.

 

Any help understanding this appreciated.

 

Sairam<div></div>